Discover

In today's fast-paced business environment, organizations are constantly seeking ways to optimize operations, improve efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. Yet, amidst the pursuit of cutting-edge technologies and innovative strategies, one fundamental element often gets overlooked: comprehensive documentation.

According to a Gartner survey, 47% of digital workers struggle to find the information needed to effectively perform their jobs. Even more concerning, McKinsey Global Institute reports that the average interaction worker spends an estimated 20 percent of their workweek looking for internal information or tracking down colleagues who can help with specific tasks. These numbers highlight a pressing issue: without comprehensive documentation, businesses bleed time and productivity.

For Chief Human Resources Officers (CHROs) and Chief Operations Officers (COOs), addressing this challenge isn't just about improving efficiency—it's about unlocking your organization's full potential. Here’s why.

The hidden costs of poor documentation

When documentation is inadequate, fragmented, or outdated, the consequences ripple throughout the organization. New employees struggle to get up to speed, seasoned staff waste time searching for information, and critical knowledge walks out the door when employees leave.

Consider this scenario: A manufacturing company loses a senior engineer who's been with the organization for 15 years. Despite their invaluable expertise, much of their knowledge was never properly documented. The result? Production delays, quality issues, and a lengthy, expensive training period for their replacement. What could have been a smooth transition instead becomes a significant operational disruption.

This scenario plays out daily across industries, creating invisible drains on productivity and morale. But comprehensive documentation offers a solution that benefits both operations and human resources departments alike.

The CHRO perspective: Documentation as a people strategy

For CHROs, comprehensive documentation goes far beyond simple record-keeping—it's a strategic asset that directly impacts workforce effectiveness and satisfaction.

1. Employee onboarding and training

New hires need structure and clarity. Well-documented onboarding processes ensure a seamless transition, reducing the time it takes for employees to become productive. A centralized knowledge repository allows HR teams to:

• Standardize training programs
• Reduce repetitive questions
• Provide easy access to policies, role expectations, and performance guidelines

For instance, a growing tech company struggling with inconsistent onboarding created a digital repository of HR policies, training materials, and SOPs. The result? A significant reduction in onboarding time and increased employee confidence from day one.

2. Compliance and risk mitigation

HR compliance is a high-stakes responsibility. Without proper documentation, organizations expose themselves to legal risks, penalties, and reputational damage. From employee handbooks to training certifications, CHROs rely on comprehensive documentation to ensure:

• Alignment with labor laws and industry regulations
• Consistency in handling workplace disputes and grievances
• Proper record-keeping for audits and legal protection

When documentation is lacking, organizations expose themselves to significant legal and financial risks. Conversely, thorough documentation provides protection during audits or legal challenges, potentially saving millions in fines or settlements.

3. Knowledge retention and workforce continuity

When experienced employees leave, they take valuable institutional knowledge with them. Documenting critical HR processes creates a knowledge base that transcends individual employees, ensuring business continuity despite personnel changes.

• Documentation prevents the loss of critical expertise and best practices
• Clear documentation reduces confusion and errors during employee transitions
• Properly documented processes minimize disruption when key team members depart

Imagine a healthcare organization whose benefits administrator retires, leaving their replacement struggling for months because crucial system nuances existed only in the retiring administrator's mind. Proper documentation could have prevented this confusion and frustration.

4. Conflict resolution and performance management

Clear documentation eliminates ambiguity in employee expectations and performance evaluations. By standardizing HR policies, organizations can:

• Foster fair and transparent performance reviews
• Reduce disputes over job roles and responsibilities
• Create an equitable work environment

This consistency empowers managers to provide objective feedback based on established criteria. Additionally, well-documented performance standards help employees understand exactly what success looks like in their roles.

The COO perspective: Documentation as an operational imperative

For COOs focused on optimizing performance and ensuring operational excellence, comprehensive documentation provides the foundation for efficiency, consistency, and scalability.

1. Operational consistency and efficiency

Without proper documentation, processes tend to drift over time and vary between teams or locations. This inconsistency leads to quality issues, customer dissatisfaction, and inefficiency. Comprehensive documentation establishes clear standards and procedures, ensuring consistency across the organization regardless of who's performing the task or where it's being done. It enables organizations to:

• Establish repeatable, scalable processes
• Reduce dependency on specific employees
• Minimize disruptions caused by personnel changes

For example, a restaurant chain discovered this when they noticed significant quality variations between locations. Investigation revealed that each restaurant had developed slightly different procedures for food preparation. By documenting standardized processes and ensuring adherence across all locations, they not only improved quality but also reduced waste and training costs.

2. Risk management and disaster recovery

When a crisis strikes, clear documentation becomes invaluable. Whether facing a natural disaster, cybersecurity breach, or unexpected leadership change, organizations with well-documented contingency plans can respond quickly and effectively. Documentation plays a critical role in mitigating risks by:

• Establishing contingency plans
• Creating a structured disaster recovery strategy
• Ensuring a smooth transition during leadership changes

Imagine a financial services firm with their primary data center experiencing a prolonged power outage. Because steps for failover are clearly documented and regularly tested, they can maintain operations with minimal disruption while competitors struggle for days to restore service. 

3. Removing silos and enhancing cross-department collaboration

When departments operate in silos, inefficiencies arise. A centralized knowledge management system promotes better communication and synergy between HR, operations, finance, and other teams. By documenting and sharing best practices across departments, organizations foster:

• Streamlined decision-making
• Faster problem resolution
• Greater alignment of company goals

For example, a global financial services firm implemented an internal knowledge-sharing system, which reduced redundant work and improved collaboration between HR and operations, saving thousands of work hours annually.

4. Scalability and growth

As businesses expand, they must scale operations effectively. Standardized documentation allows organizations to:

• Replicate successful processes in new locations
• Train new employees efficiently
• Ensure quality control and adherence to best practices

A SaaS company, for instance, used structured documentation to standardize its customer support processes, which allowed it to scale its team from 50 to 200 employees without a dip in service quality.

Shared priorities for CHROs and COOs

1. Compliance and legal protection

Both HR and operations leaders depend on documentation to ensure regulatory compliance and avoid legal complications. Whether it’s HR policies or operational safety protocols, clear documentation provides a safety net for organizations.

2. Enhancing employee productivity

When employees have easy access to well-documented processes and policies, they spend less time searching for information and more time executing tasks. This improves productivity and job satisfaction.

3. Change management

Organizations constantly evolve—whether through digital transformation, mergers, or internal restructuring. Well-maintained documentation ensures smooth transitions and minimizes disruptions during periods of change.

4. Cost efficiency

Time is money, and inefficiencies cost businesses millions annually. By reducing redundant efforts, optimizing resource allocation, and preventing costly errors, comprehensive documentation directly impacts the bottom line.

Documentation as a strategic investment

Comprehensive documentation isn't merely a compliance or administrative task—it's a strategic investment that yields returns across multiple dimensions of organizational performance. For CHROs and COOs alike, prioritizing documentation delivers tangible benefits to the workforce, operations, and ultimately, the bottom line.

Organizations that fail to prioritize documentation risk falling into the trap of inefficiency, non-compliance, and operational silos. On the other hand, those that invest in structured knowledge management create a workplace that is productive, scalable, and future-ready.

The question isn’t whether you need documentation—it’s whether your organization can afford to operate without it.

Scaling a business is both an exciting and daunting task. As demand grows, the complexities in operations, management, and services also increase. However, one of the most underrated yet powerful tools to navigate this labyrinth of growth is the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) documentation.

What is SOP Documentation?

Standard Operating Procedure documentation is essentially a written, step-by-step instruction manual on how to execute a specific task or operation within a company. It streamlines complex tasks, ensures consistency across operations, and equips new employees with clear directives.

The Role of SOPs in Scaling Your Business

1. Consistency: As a business grows, maintaining the same level of service or product quality can become a challenge. SOPs ensure that all tasks, regardless of who performs them, are done in a consistent manner. This uniformity assures customers of the same high-quality experience, strengthening brand loyalty.
2. Efficiency: Well-documented procedures can significantly reduce the time spent on training and task execution. Instead of relying on memory or improvisation, employees can follow a tried-and-true process, thereby speeding up operations and reducing errors.
3. Employee Onboarding: With a growing business comes the need for more hands on deck. SOPs provide new hires with a clear roadmap of their responsibilities, enabling faster acclimatization to the company culture and operations.
4. Risk Management: Mistakes can be costly, both in terms of finances and reputation. SOPs minimize human errors by detailing precisely how tasks should be carried out. Moreover, in the event of key personnel departures, the business isn’t left vulnerable; the SOPs ensure continuity.
5. Facilitates Delegation: For business leaders, delegation becomes crucial as the company grows. SOPs allow leaders to hand over tasks with confidence, knowing the task will be performed according to set standards.

Crafting Effective SOPs

• ‍Define the Scope: Start by identifying which processes need SOPs. Prioritize those that are mission-critical, repetitive, complex, or prone to errors.‍
• Collaborate: Engage teams and individuals who regularly perform the tasks. Their hands-on experience can provide valuable insights that can make the SOP more practical.‍
• Keep it Clear and Concise: While it’s essential to be detailed, also ensure the document is not overly technical or lengthy. Use simple language, bullet points, diagrams, and flowcharts to enhance readability.‍
• Review and Update: Business operations evolve, and so should your SOPs. Regularly revisit and refine them to ensure they remain current and effective.‍
• Store Centrally and Make Accessible: An SOP is of no use if employees can’t find it. Use a central repository, such as a company intranet or a cloud-based system, to store and categorize all SOPs.

Digital Transformation of SOPs

In this digital age, businesses are moving beyond static Word documents or PDFs. Digital SOP platforms, integrated with videos, augmented reality (AR), and interactive elements, make it easier for employees to understand and engage with the content. Such systems can also offer real-time updates and feedback mechanisms.

Challenges in SOP Implementation

While SOPs offer myriad benefits, their implementation isn’t without challenges:

• Resistance to Change: Long-standing employees might be resistant to new methods. Address this by showcasing the value SOPs bring to their daily tasks and offering training sessions.
• Over Documentation: Avoid the pitfall of creating SOPs for every little task. Focus on processes that genuinely need standardization.
• Ambiguity: Ensure that the SOP doesn’t leave room for interpretation. It should be specific and clear-cut to avoid different interpretations.

Conclusion

In the grand scheme of business growth, Standard Operating Procedure documentation might seem like a minor cog. However, its impact on efficiency, consistency, and scalability is profound. As your business ventures into new territories, encounters novel challenges, and strives to meet increasing demand, SOPs can be the guiding light, ensuring that the essence of your brand and the quality of your service remain unblemished. Embrace them, refine them, and watch them play an instrumental role in your business’s success story.

Imagine this: Your team just launched a new feature after months of hard work. Everything seems perfect until customer support reports a flood of confused users. The documentation is confusing because the writer only saw the product days before launch. Sound familiar?

Most teams bring in technical writers at the last minute, treating documentation as an afterthought. But what if involving writers from the very beginning could not only improve your documentation but make your product better too?

The last-minute documentation scramble

When technical writers join late in the process, they face an uphill battle. Consider a typical scenario:

Sarah, a technical writer, receives an urgent email on Thursday: "The new analytics dashboard launches Monday. Can you write up the documentation?" She has never seen the feature, wasn't involved in any planning, and now must scramble to understand complex functionality while racing against the clock.

The result? Documentation that misses key workflows, uses inconsistent terminology, and fails to address real user questions. No wonder users get frustrated and flood support channels.

What changes when writers join early

Now imagine a different approach. Sarah is invited to the initial planning meeting for the analytics dashboard. As the team discusses features, she asks questions like:

• "How will users navigate between different report types?"
• "What terms should we use consistently throughout the interface and documentation?"
• "What previous feature does this replace, and how do we help users transition?"

These questions don't just improve documentation—they improve the product itself.

Real-world impacts

Involvement of technical writers at the beginning triggers a series of downstream benefits.

Consider this hypothetical example:

A software company developing a project management tool brought their technical writer, Miguel, into planning meetings for a new task automation feature. During discussions, Miguel pointed out that the proposed workflow used different terminology than existing features.

This simple observation led to:

• Revised interface text that used consistent language
• Clearer documentation that connected the new feature to existing ones
• A more intuitive user experience
• Fewer support tickets after launch

The product manager later estimated they saved weeks of post-launch fixes and significantly reduced user confusion.

How technical writers contribute beyond documentation

Technical writers bring unique perspectives to development:

User advocates: Writers approach products from the user's perspective, not the developer's. They ask the "how will someone figure this out?" questions that technical teams might overlook.

Clarity experts: Writers excel at spotting confusing terminology or workflows before they're coded into the product.

Experience connectors: Good writers help ensure new features fit logically with existing functionality and documentation.

Question askers: Writers ask the questions that future users will ask—better to answer them during development than after launch.

Getting started: Simple steps for early writer involvement

You don't need to overhaul your entire process overnight. Try these steps:

1. Invite writers to kickoff meetings: Even if they're just listening, they'll gain valuable context.
   
   
2. Share prototypes and mockups: Let writers see early designs and provide feedback from a documentation perspective.
   
   
3. Review terminology together: Spend 30 minutes aligning on key terms and how features will be described.
   
   
4. Include documentation in definition of "done": Make documentation part of your completion criteria, not an afterthought.

Overcoming common challenges

"We don't have the resources": Even limited early involvement is better than none. If you can't include writers in every meeting, prioritize kickoffs and major review points.

"Developers resist writer involvement": Start small. Position writers as helpers who make developers' lives easier by reducing support questions and user confusion.

"Our writers are too busy": Consider that early involvement often reduces total documentation time by preventing rework and confusion.

A day in the life: Early vs. late involvement

Late involvement: The writer gets a near-final product, spends days trying to understand it, creates documentation based on guesswork, and users still end up confused.

Early involvement: The writer understands the feature's purpose from day one, helps shape intuitive workflows, creates documentation that evolves with the product, and users find answers easily.

From documentation afterthought to strategic advantage

Involving technical writers from the beginning of your development process isn't just about better documentation—it's about building better products. Writers bring unique perspectives that can identify problems before they're coded, create more intuitive user experiences, and ultimately reduce support costs and improve user satisfaction.

The next time you kick off a new feature or product, ask yourself: "Should our technical writer be in this meeting?" The answer is probably yes.

Why wait until the end of development to bring in technical writers? Including documentation experts from the start of your engineering process isn't just a nice-to-have—it's a strategic advantage that can transform your product development lifecycle.

The traditional documentation dilemma

For too many organizations, technical documentation remains an afterthought—something to be rushed together before release after the "real work" is done. This approach leads to predictable problems: documentation not matching the final product, frustrated users, increased support costs, and burned-out writers trying to understand complex systems under tight deadlines.

But what if there were a better way?

The business case for early documentation involvement

When technical writers participate in early planning meetings and design discussions, they bring a unique perspective that helps identify potential user pain points, clarity issues, and documentation needs before they become costly problems.

Reduced costs: Issues identified early in the design phase are significantly cheaper to fix than those discovered after development. Technical writers often spot usability problems, confusing terminology, or implementation inconsistencies that might otherwise slip through.

Increased efficiency: With writers involved from the beginning, documentation evolves alongside the product rather than being frantically created at the end. This parallel development eliminates the "documentation debt" that often creates bottlenecks before release.

Enhanced user experience: Technical writers are user advocates who constantly ask, "Will this make sense to someone who hasn't been in our planning meetings?" This perspective often leads to more intuitive interfaces and clearer workflows.

Technical writers as knowledge custodians

Beyond creating end-user documentation, technical writers serve as invaluable knowledge managers throughout the development process.

Organizational memory: How many times has your team asked, "Where are the specs for this feature?" or "Didn't we discuss this already?" Technical writers excel at organizing internal project documentation, creating and maintaining centralized repositories, and ensuring critical information doesn't get lost in endless email threads or chat conversations.

As one senior developer put it: "Our technical writer knows where everything is documented. She's our in-house loremaster."

Continuous documentation: When writers are integrated into the development process, documentation evolves naturally with each sprint or milestone. Changes are captured as they happen rather than reconstructed weeks or months later. This approach ensures accuracy and dramatically reduces the end-of-project documentation crunch that so often leads to quality issues.

How technical writers enhance the development process

Technical writers bring more to development than just their writing skills:

User advocacy: While engineers and product managers focus on features and functionality, technical writers constantly consider the user's perspective. They ask the questions users would ask and push for clarity where there might be confusion.

Language precision: Writers help streamline API naming conventions, improve UI labeling, and create consistent terminology across the product. This linguistic consistency makes products more intuitive and reduces the learning curve for users.

Identifying gaps: Good technical writers have a talent for spotting missing information or unexplained functionality. "What happens if the user does X?" or "How does this interact with feature Y?" These questions often uncover edge cases or integration issues early in the development cycle.

Documentation architecture: Just as software needs a solid architecture, so does documentation. Writers can design information structures that will scale with the product and accommodate future expansions without requiring complete reorganization.

Breaking down silos: Writers as cross-functional team members

The most effective technical writing happens when writers are fully integrated into development teams:

Participation in the full lifecycle: From initial brainstorming through design, development, testing, and release, technical writers add value at every stage. They can help clarify requirements, document design decisions, create user-friendly error messages, develop testing scenarios, and prepare release notes—all while building comprehensive documentation.

Cross-team communication: Technical writers often work across multiple teams, giving them a broader perspective on how different components interact. This position makes them valuable connectors who can facilitate knowledge transfer between specialized teams.

Documentation that reflects reality: When writers witness the development process firsthand, they create documentation that reflects how the product actually works—not just how it was intended to work. This accuracy is crucial for user trust and adoption.

Implementing the integrated approach

Bringing technical writers into the early stages of development requires some adjustments:

Team structure: Consider where technical writers fit in your organization. Are they part of engineering teams? Product teams? A separate documentation department? The most successful models usually involve writers being embedded with development teams while maintaining connections to other writers for consistency.

Process integration: Define clear touch points for documentation throughout your development process. Include documentation tasks in sprint planning, feature kickoffs, and review cycles.

Collaboration tools: Ensure writers have access to the same tools as developers—code repositories, issue trackers, design documents, and testing environments. This access is essential to create accurate, timely documentation.

Cultural shift: Perhaps most importantly, foster a culture that values documentation as an integral part of the product, not just an accessory. Recognize that good documentation reflects good design and clear thinking.

The future of technical documentation in product development

As products become more complex and user expectations rise, the role of technical writers continues to evolve:

Documentation-driven development: Some teams are now using documentation as a design tool, writing the user guide before writing code to ensure the product is intuitive and sensible from the user's perspective.

Integrated documentation tools: Modern development environments increasingly support embedded documentation that lives alongside code, making it easier to keep documentation and functionality synchronized.

Strategic information architecture: Technical writers are becoming information strategists who design holistic knowledge systems spanning multiple formats and platforms—from traditional manuals to interactive guides, videos, chatbots, and embedded help.

In conclusion

Good documentation isn't just about explaining what you built—it's also about building something worth explaining. By including technical writers from the beginning of your development process, you gain not only better documentation but also better products, more efficient teams, and happier users.

Technical writers aren't just scribes who record what engineers have created; they're strategic partners who help shape products that are clear, consistent, and user-focused. In a world where user experience often determines market success, that partnership isn't just nice to have—it's a competitive necessity.

Remember: The best time to involve technical writers isn't at the end of development. It's at the beginning.

You've just closed your Series A, and suddenly everything's moving at hyperspeed. New team members are joining weekly, and everyone's excited about the growth ahead. But beneath the surface, a critical challenge is emerging – your internal policies aren't keeping pace with your expansion. Documents are scattered across drives, approvals are lost in email threads, and new hires are struggling to find the information they need.

You're not alone. While clear, well-managed internal policies are the foundation of successful scaling, many fast-growing companies stumble when it comes to policy management. In this post, we'll explore seven common pitfalls that can derail your growth and show you how AllyMatter's purpose-built platform helps you avoid them.

Pitfall 1: Lack of Clarity and Specificity

When policies are vague or ambiguous, confusion reigns. Consider a common "work from home" policy that simply states "employees may work remotely when appropriate." Without clear guidelines on what constitutes "appropriate," you'll face inconsistent interpretation across teams and inevitable conflicts.

This lack of specificity doesn't just frustrate employees – it creates ripple effects across your organization, from decreased productivity to potential compliance risks. The challenge intensifies as you scale, with each new hire adding their own interpretation to unclear policies.

Pitfall 2: Insufficient Stakeholder Input

Creating policies in isolation is a recipe for failure. Imagine your IT team implementing new security protocols without consulting client-facing teams. The result? A policy that looks perfect on paper but creates significant friction in daily operations, potentially hampering client relationships and team productivity.

As organizations grow, the gap between policy creators and those affected by the policies often widens, leading to guidelines that don't reflect operational realities or address real-world challenges.

Pitfall 3: Poor Communication and Dissemination

Even the most well-crafted policies fail if they don't reach the right people at the right time. In fast-growing companies, critical updates often get buried in overflowing inboxes or lost in chat threads. When your sales team can't quickly find the latest pricing policy, or your support team is working from outdated customer service guidelines, the impact on your business is immediate and costly.

Pitfall 4: Absence of Training and Education

Distribution isn't enough – employees need to understand how policies apply to their specific roles. Without proper training, even straightforward policies can lead to confusion and mistakes. This is particularly crucial for compliance-related policies where misunderstandings can have serious legal implications.

Pitfall 5: Failure to Review and Update Regularly

As your company evolves, your policies must keep pace. Yet many organizations treat policy creation as a one-time event rather than an ongoing process. When your hybrid work policy still reflects pre-pandemic thinking, or your security guidelines haven't caught up with new threats, you're exposing your organization to unnecessary risks.

Pitfall 6: Inadequate Documentation and Record-Keeping

Poor documentation isn't just an administrative headache – it's a legal liability waiting to happen. Without clear records of policy acknowledgments and updates, you're vulnerable during audits and potential disputes. This risk multiplies as your organization grows and regulatory requirements become more complex.

How AllyMatter Solves These Policy Management Challenges

AllyMatter wasn't built just to store documents – it's designed specifically to help fast-growing companies overcome these common policy management pitfalls. Here's exactly how our platform addresses each challenge:

Clarity and Specificity

• WYSIWYG Editor with Templates: Our intuitive editor includes pre-built templates for common policies, ensuring consistency and completeness. Each template includes suggested sections and sample language that you can customize for your needs.

• Version Control with Change Tracking: Every edit is tracked and highlighted, making it easy to see how policies evolve and ensuring clarity about what's changed.

• Smart Document Organization: Build structured, hierarchical documentation with clear categories and tags, making it easy for employees to find exactly what they need.

Stakeholder Input and Collaboration

• Collaborative Review Workflows: Create custom approval flows involving multiple stakeholders, ensuring all relevant perspectives are captured before policies are finalized.

• Comment and Feedback System: Stakeholders can provide targeted feedback directly within documents, with threaded discussions to resolve questions or concerns.

• Role-Based Access Control: Granular permissions ensure the right people are involved at the right stages of policy development.

Effective Communication and Dissemination

• Smart Notifications: Automated alerts notify relevant team members when policies are updated, with confirmation tracking to ensure receipt.

• Centralized Access: A single source of truth for all policies, accessible through an intuitive interface that works on any device.

• Powerful Search: Advanced search capabilities help employees find relevant policies quickly, with filters for department, category, and status.

Training and Education

• Built-in Acknowledgment System: Track who has read and acknowledged each policy, with automated reminders for those who haven't.

• Version-Specific Training: Link training materials directly to policy versions, ensuring employees always have access to relevant guidance.

• Interactive Elements: Add quizzes, checklists, and interactive elements to policies to verify understanding.

Regular Reviews and Updates

• Automated Review Reminders: Set review schedules for policies, with automatic notifications when updates are due.

• Impact Analysis: Track which policies are most frequently accessed and where users might be struggling, helping you prioritize updates.

• Change Management Tools: Structured processes for updating policies, including approval workflows and automatic notification of affected employees.

Documentation and Record-Keeping

• Comprehensive Audit Trail: Every interaction with a policy is logged, from views to acknowledgments to approvals.

• E-Signature Integration: Secure, legally-binding signatures for policies that require formal acknowledgment.

• Automated Compliance Reports: Generate reports showing policy distribution, acknowledgment rates, and review status – perfect for audits and compliance reviews.

Beyond Features: The AllyMatter Difference

While individual features are important, AllyMatter's real value comes from how these capabilities work together to create a seamless policy management experience. Our platform is built for growing companies, with the flexibility to adapt as your needs evolve and the simplicity to get started quickly.

We understand that policy management isn't just about documents – it's about creating a foundation for sustainable growth. That's why we've designed AllyMatter to be more than just a repository. It's a dynamic system that helps you build and maintain the structure your growing organization needs.

Making the Transition

Ready to transform your policy management? Getting started with AllyMatter is straightforward, and we're here to help every step of the way:

1. Let our team migrate your existing policies with our white-glove migration service

2. Set up your organizational structure and user roles

3. Configure your approval workflows and notification preferences

4. Start managing policies more effectively immediately

Don't let poor policy management hold back your growth. Reserve your spot on the waitlist today, and our team of experts will reach out to schedule a personalized demo, showing you how AllyMatter can help your organization scale with confidence.

A business requirement document (BRD) is a formal document that outlines the requirements for a business project or initiative. A BRD typically outlines the project scope and objectives, including details on the project timeline, budget, deliverables, stakeholders, and any other relevant information necessary for successful execution.

To properly define and document a business requirement, it is important to have a consistent and well-defined process. This article outlines the important steps involved in the process of writing a BRD.

Why BRDs are important

A BRD isn't just another document in your project pipeline—it's the foundation upon which successful projects are built. This comprehensive document details the exact requirements of a project, such as the objectives, scope, timeline, and budget. Without a BRD, projects often lack clarity and direction, leading to miscommunication and missed expectations.

A well-structured BRD establishes a common understanding between the project stakeholders of what needs to be achieved. It acts as a blueprint for the project, providing clear guidelines on its goals and timeline. A BRD gives the project team a clear direction and ensures everyone works towards the same goals.

Beyond alignment, a BRD plays a crucial role in financial management by establishing the project's budget and ensuring costs stay controlled. This document empowers project managers to understand and manage project costs effectively, significantly increasing the chances of completing work within allocated budgets.

A BRD can also help ensure the project is completed on time. The document will set out the timeline for the project and the tasks that need to be completed at each stage. This allows the project manager to track progress and ensure that the project is completed on schedule.

Finally, a BRD can be used as a reference point for the project team throughout the course of the project. All stakeholders can refer to it when necessary to ensure that the project is on track and that any changes or modifications are in line with the requirements outlined in the document.

In conclusion, a BRD is essential for any successful project. It is a comprehensive document that outlines the project’s objectives, scope, timeline, and budget. It establishes a common understanding between stakeholders and provides a reference point throughout the project. A BRD is necessary to ensure the project is completed on time and within the allocated budget.

BRD writing, a step-by-step approach

To write a BRD, follow these steps:

1. Define the purpose and scope of the project: Start by clearly defining what the project is trying to achieve and its scope. This includes the problem the project is trying to solve, the goals of the project, and what stakeholders are involved.
2. Identify the stakeholders: Identify who will be impacted by the project and who will be responsible for making decisions about it. This includes internal stakeholders, such as employees and departments, and external stakeholders, such as customers and partners.
3. Define the business requirements: Identify the specific requirements for the project, including functional requirements (what the solution needs to do), non-functional requirements (such as performance or security requirements), and constraints (such as budget or time restrictions).
4. Gather and document the requirements: Gather all of the requirements from stakeholders and document them clearly and concisely. Make sure to prioritize the requirements and clearly state any assumptions or constraints.
5. Validate the requirements: Verify that all of the requirements are accurate and align with the project’s goals. This includes getting feedback from stakeholders and testing the requirements to ensure they are achievable.
6. Approve the BRD: Once the requirements are validated, have the stakeholders approve the BRD. This ensures that everyone agrees about what needs to be done and that there is a clear understanding of the requirements.
7. Use the BRD as a reference: Use the BRD as a reference throughout the project to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that the project is staying on track.

Remember that a BRD is not a detailed design document. Instead, it provides a high-level overview of the requirements and serves as a starting point for the project. Think of it as your project's north star – guiding but not micromanaging. The BRD should be reviewed and updated regularly as the project progresses and requirements evolve.

Essential elements of a BRD

A compelling BRD must be clear, concise, and comprehensive, containing all the necessary information to complete the project successfully. Let's explore the key components that make up an effective BRD:

Overview & executive summary

A well-written BRD should provide a clear project overview, including the goals, objectives, and expected outcomes. It should contain a detailed description of the project’s scope, timeline, and budget. Furthermore, the BRD should include a list of stakeholders and their roles in the project.

Project success criteria

The BRD should also define the project’s success criteria. This includes the criteria used to measure the project’s success and should be aligned with the overall project objectives. For example, the success criteria may include increased revenue, customer satisfaction, or decreased costs.

Detailed deliverables

The BRD should also include a detailed description of the project’s deliverables. This should include a list of all the deliverables, the associated deadlines, and the roles and responsibilities of each team member. It should also include the acceptance criteria for each deliverable, which are the criteria used to judge the success of the deliverable.

Risk management plan

A comprehensive BRD should also include a Risk Management Plan. This plan should identify potential risks associated with the project and provide strategies for mitigating and managing those risks. The plan should include a risk matrix which categorizes and rates the impact of each risk, as well as possible strategies for addressing them.

Resource needs

Finally, the BRD should include a list of resources required for the project. This should include the financial and non-financial resources required to complete the project. The list should include the costs associated with each resource and the personnel required to acquire and utilize those resources.

Creating a well-written BRD isn't just about checking boxes—it's about setting your project up for success. A thoughtfully developed BRD provides all stakeholders with clarity on objectives and ensures your project stays on time and within budget.

Stakeholders involved

Since BRDs serve as the foundation for organizing and tracking all of the business requirements and are instrumental in keeping projects on track and ensuring customer satisfaction. As such, the responsibility for writing a BRD should be placed in the hands of the most qualified and experienced personnel who understand the project requirements and have a working knowledge of the customer’s needs.

The individual who should write a BRD will vary depending on the size and scope of the project. However, in general, the project manager, lead engineer, or software architect will typically be the primary author of the BRD. These individuals have the most knowledge of the project, its requirements, and customer needs, and are able to effectively communicate the desired outcome of the project in a way that all stakeholders can understand.

Who should be consulted and why?

The BRD should be written with input from those who are most familiar with the project, including the project’s stakeholders, end users, and subject-matter experts. Stakeholders should be consulted to ensure that the BRD is aligned with their vision for the project, while end users should be consulted to ensure that the requirements are feasible and address the needs of the customer. Subject-matter experts can provide valuable insight into the technology and processes that are necessary to fulfill the project requirements.

Who should be informed and why?

Once the BRD is completed, all stakeholders and team members should be informed of its completion and given access to the document. This ensures that everyone involved in the project is aware of the project requirements and can provide feedback on the document. Additionally, it allows team members to stay up to date on any changes or modifications that may occur during the development process.

Who is supposed to review and approve the BRD before it is published?

The BRD should be reviewed and approved by all key stakeholders prior to publication. This includes the project manager, customer, sponsors, and any other individuals who are directly involved with the project. This review process should be conducted to ensure that the BRD accurately reflects the project requirements and customer needs. Additionally, all team members should review and approve the BRD to ensure that the project requirements are feasible and that there is a clear understanding of the desired outcome of the project.

6 important tips when writing a BRD

Creating an effective BRD isn't just about following a template—it's about crafting a document that truly serves your project's needs. Here are six practical tips to elevate your BRD:

1. Thoroughly review all of the project requirements prior to writing the BRD. This will ensure that the document accurately reflects the scope and goals of the project.
2. Define each stakeholder’s role in the BRD: It is important to clearly identify each stakeholder’s role in the BRD so that the document is accurate and complete.
3. Establish project deadlines: Establishing project deadlines in the BRD will help keep the project on track and ensure that the customer’s expectations are met.
4. Identify customer requirements: It is essential to identify customer requirements in the BRD in order to ensure customer satisfaction and a successful outcome for the project.
5. Incorporate visuals: Visuals, such as charts and diagrams, can be useful in communicating project requirements and outcomes.
6. Clarify assumptions and dependencies: Clarifying any assumptions and dependencies in the BRD will allow team members to plan and account for any potential obstacles that may arise during the project.

Understanding the difference between BRD and functional requirements document (FRD)

BRDs and FRDs are critical components of any software development project. Both documents provide a clear understanding of the project’s objectives, the stakeholders involved, and the expectations of the business. While they have similarities, they are distinct documents and have different purposes.

A BRD is a high-level document articulating what the software will do, why it’s needed, and who will use it. It is used to determine the project’s scope and objectives and identify the stakeholders’ requirements. The BRD should also include a timeline and cost estimate.

The FRD is a document that describes the specific requirements for the software. It should provide detailed information about the features and functions that the software will need to deliver for it to meet the needs of the stakeholders. The FRD should also explain how the software will be tested to ensure the requirements are met.

The BRD is the first document created, and it sets the foundation for the development of the FRD. Once the BRD is completed, the project team can use it to develop the FRD. The FRD should provide a comprehensive overview of the software’s features and functions.

In summary, BRDs and FRDs are two critical documents in the software development process. The BRD is the initial document that provides an overview of the project and identifies the stakeholders. The FRD is the detailed document that provides the specific requirements for a project.

The BRD advantage: Setting your projects up for success

BRDs are not just documentation—they're strategic assets for any project, whether in software development or broader enterprise initiatives. They serve as the critical foundation that clearly identifies project objectives, stakeholder expectations, and desired outcomes. By establishing this shared understanding from the start, BRDs significantly increase your project's chances of meeting all stakeholders' needs and delivering successful results.

Beyond alignment, BRDs provide practical frameworks for time and budget management, ensuring projects stay on track financially and meet crucial deadlines. For project managers, a well-crafted BRD isn't just helpful—it's indispensable.

Remember: A BRD isn't just another document to file away—it's the vision that guides your entire project journey. By investing time in creating a comprehensive, clear BRD, you're not just planning a project—you're setting the stage for its success. In today's complex business environment, the importance of a well-constructed BRD simply cannot be overstated.

In today’s fast-paced corporate world, having a reliable and efficient human resources (HR) ticketing system is paramount. However, the success of any system is often tied to the quality of its documentation. Good documentation aids in the smooth implementation, use, and maintenance of the system. Besides, it drives adoption and maximizes your technology investment.

If you’re tasked with creating documentation for an HR ticketing system, here’s a step-by-step guide to help you craft a comprehensive, user-friendly guide.

1. Define your system's purpose and goals

Before you start writing, have a clear understanding of what the HR ticketing system is designed to achieve. Is it for handling employee grievances, processing payroll queries, or managing leave applications? Or perhaps it’s a combination of multiple functionalities? Knowing the system’s purpose will shape the content and tone of your documentation.

Once you're clear on your system's purpose, you're ready to introduce it effectively to your users.

2. Start with an introduction

Begin your documentation with an introductory section that:

• Explains the purpose and scope of the HR ticketing system.
• Provides a brief overview of the main components and features.
• Lists the intended audience, whether it’s HR professionals, general employees, or both.

3. Outline the user interface

Provide a detailed walkthrough of the system’s user interface:

• Use screenshots to illustrate different sections and features.
• Highlight the primary navigation menus, buttons, and fields.
• Ensure clarity by using annotations or arrows to point out crucial elements.

For example: The dashboard displays your open tickets in the left panel, with priority levels color-coded (red for urgent, yellow for medium priority, green for low priority).

4. Create step-by-step guides for common processes

Break down typical tasks into step-by-step instructions. For an HR ticketing system, these might include:

• How to create a new ticket.
• How to categorize and prioritize tickets.
• Steps for escalating a ticket.
• The process for closing and archiving completed tickets.

Use clear, concise language, and consider including screenshots for each step to visually guide the user.

5. Connect your systems: Integration considerations

Modern HR departments rely on multiple systems working together. Your documentation should address:

• How the ticketing system integrates with other HR platforms (HRIS, payroll, LMS, etc.)
• Data flow between systems (what information transfers automatically vs. manually)
• Authentication methods (Single Sign-On options)
• Troubleshooting integration issues

Be specific about the integration capabilities. For example: When an employee updates their address in the HRIS, this information automatically syncs with the ticketing system within 24 hours.

6. Empower users with troubleshooting section

Even the most well-designed systems can face issues. Dedicate a section to common problems users might encounter and provide solutions for each:

• List frequent error messages and their meanings.
• Describe common user mistakes and how to avoid or correct them.
• Provide steps for system resets or basic debugging if applicable.

7. Ensure compliance throughout documentation

Given the regulatory requirements surrounding HR functions, include:

• How the system helps maintain compliance with relevant laws (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)
• Documentation retention requirements and capabilities
• Audit trail functionality
• Required approval workflows for sensitive processes

8. Highlight security and data privacy measures

In an age where data privacy is critical, your documentation should assure users of the system’s security measures:

• Explain how personal and sensitive data is protected.
• Outline the data backup and recovery processes.
• Provide guidelines on setting strong passwords and maintaining user confidentiality.

9. Enable decision with metrics and reporting

Help HR teams leverage data-driven insights:

• Document available reports and dashboards
• Explain how to create custom reports
• Provide examples of how metrics can inform decision-making

For example: By tracking “Time to Resolution’ for benefits questions, you can identify which benefits policies may need clearer employee communication.

10. Address accessibility

Your HR ticketing system should be inclusive and accessible to all users, including those with disabilities:

• Provide tips on using the system with screen readers or other assistive technologies.
• Describe any built-in accessibility features.
• Offer alternatives for users who might face challenges in accessing the system.

11. Tailor documentation for different user roles

Different stakeholders need different information:

• HR administrators need complete system knowledge.
• Managers need to know how to approve requests and view team metrics.
• Employees need focused guides on submitting and tracking their tickets.

Create role-specific quick-start guides that contain only what each user type needs to know.

12. Optimize for mobile

With remote and hybrid work becoming standard, document mobile functionality:

• Differences between desktop and mobile interfaces
• Mobile-specific features and limitations
• Tips for efficient mobile use

Emphasizing mobile is particularly relevant, as HubEngage indicates 85% of employees favor smartphones for workplace HR communications.

13. FAQs and best practices

A well-crafted FAQ section can quickly address common user queries. Gather feedback from initial users or beta testers to compile this section. Additionally, suggest best practices to ensure efficient use of the system, such as:

• Proper ticket categorization techniques.
• Guidelines for clear communication within tickets.
• Tips for tracking and following up on pending tickets.

14. Build a clear glossary of Terms

To ensure comprehension, include a glossary that defines any technical or industry-specific terms used throughout your documentation.

15. Provide contact information

Despite the best documentation, users will sometimes need direct assistance. Ensure they know how to get help:

• List contact details for technical support, including email, phone numbers, and hours of operation.
• Include response time expectations.
• Offer links to online resources or forums if available.

16. Update the documentation regularly

As the HR ticketing system evolves, so should your documentation. Regularly review and update the guide to reflect system changes, additional features, or feedback from users. Document version history clearly so users know when information was last updated.

17. Seek feedback and test the documentation

Before finalizing, ask a diverse group of users to test the documentation. Their feedback can identify missing information or areas of confusion.

Maximize HR efficiency through strategic documentation

Creating comprehensive documentation for an HR ticketing system requires a mix of technical knowledge, empathy for the end-user, and an eye for detail. Remember, the primary goal is to simplify the user’s experience, making it as straightforward and hassle-free as possible. With a well-crafted guide, you not only empower users but also reduce the strain on support teams, leading to an overall efficient and effective HR ticketing system.

While Google Docs offers familiar and accessible document creation tools, it was never designed to serve as a comprehensive internal knowledge management system. Organizations that attempt to build their knowledge repositories on Google Docs quickly encounter significant limitations that hamper efficiency, collaboration, and growth. Here's why Google Docs fails as an enterprise knowledge base solution.

Organizational structure limitations

Folder-based organization only

Google Docs relies primarily on a traditional folder structure, which becomes increasingly inadequate as knowledge bases grow.

This linear organization method forces teams to decide on a single way to categorize information, when in reality, knowledge often belongs in multiple categories simultaneously. As content grows, these folder structures become unwieldy and confusing.

No true taxonomy system

Google Docs lacks a proper tagging or category system for organizing information beyond folders.

Without the ability to create a flexible taxonomy with tags, metadata, or attributes, organizations can't build intuitive navigation systems that match how people actually think about and search for information. This makes cross-referencing related content nearly impossible.

Limited interconnection between documents

While Google Docs allows basic hyperlinking, it lacks robust features for building a truly connected knowledge graph.

The system offers no automated way to identify or suggest related content, forcing users to manually maintain links between documents. This leads to knowledge silos where valuable connections between information remain undiscovered.

Search and discovery problems

Rudimentary search capabilities

Google Drive's search functionality is basic compared to dedicated knowledge management systems.

Search results are often overwhelming and poorly prioritized, with limited filtering options. The system struggles with semantic search or understanding the intent behind queries, returning literal matches rather than conceptually relevant content.

No content-specific search

Google Docs doesn't offer specialized search features tailored to knowledge base needs.

Users can't easily filter by author (instead of owner), department relevance, or other knowledge-specific attributes. Google docs offers a general search engine and cannot identify documents by version, department applicability and applicability to the searcher. This makes finding the right information at the right time needlessly difficult.

Poor handling of media and attachments

In Google Docs, content embedded within documents or attached to them isn't properly indexed for search.

As a result, critical information contained in images, diagrams, or attachments often becomes invisible to search. This leads to knowledge gaps where important context goes undiscovered.

Collaboration and workflow limitations

No structured review workflows

Google Docs lacks built-in features for knowledge review cycles or approval processes.

Without dedicated workflow tools, organizations struggle to implement systematic content reviews, approvals, or updates. This leads to outdated information remaining in circulation without proper verification or renewal.

No knowledge-specific roles

The permission system isn't designed with knowledge management roles in mind.

Google Docs' simple editor/viewer/commenter permissions don't accommodate specialized knowledge roles like subject matter experts, content approvers, or knowledge managers. This makes it difficult to implement proper governance over organizational knowledge.

Comment-based collaboration only

Relying on comments for collaboration becomes unwieldy for knowledge management at scale.

As documents accumulate dozens or hundreds of comments over time, the comment system becomes cluttered and difficult to navigate. There's no effective way to track which feedback has been addressed or incorporated.

Content standardization challenges

Inconsistent formatting

Google Docs provides few tools for enforcing consistent document structures or styles across a knowledge base.

Without strong template controls or enforced styling, knowledge content quickly becomes visually inconsistent. This not only looks unprofessional but also makes information harder to scan and comprehend.

No content types or schemas

Unlike proper knowledge bases, Google Docs doesn't support different document types with specialized attributes.

Every document follows the same basic structure, whether it's a policy, procedure, reference guide, or troubleshooting document. This one-size-fits-all approach prevents implementing best practices for different types of knowledge content.

Limited version control

While Google Docs tracks revisions, its version management features are inadequate for maintaining a structured knowledge base.

Users can't easily compare versions, tag significant revisions, or maintain parallel versions for different audiences. This creates confusion about which version represents the current "source of truth."

User experience issues

Not designed for consumption

Google Docs' interface prioritizes editing over reading or knowledge consumption.

The editing-focused interface includes numerous toolbars and menus that distract from content consumption. Unlike dedicated knowledge bases with clean reading views, Google Docs feels cluttered when users simply need information.

Poor mobile experience

Google Docs on mobile devices offers a compromised experience that hampers knowledge access.

Mobile users face formatting issues, navigation difficulties, and limited functionality. In a world where employees increasingly need knowledge access on the go, this represents a significant limitation.

No guided learning paths

Google Docs provides no way to create structured learning sequences or knowledge journeys.

Unlike proper knowledge bases that can guide users through related concepts in a logical order, Google Docs offers no way to create prescribed learning paths or structured onboarding materials.

Integration and scalability concerns

Limited API capabilities

Google Docs' API has restricted functionality for building integrated knowledge ecosystems.

Organizations seeking to connect their knowledge base with other business systems face significant technical limitations. The available integration points lack the depth needed for sophisticated knowledge management workflows.

Performance degrades at scale

As document libraries grow, Google Drive's performance noticeably deteriorates.

Organizations with thousands of knowledge documents experience slower loading times, search delays, and synchronization issues. Google Docs wasn't architected for the content volume that mature knowledge bases typically contain.

Storage limitations

Google's storage limits can become costly for media-rich knowledge bases. A Google Doc can contain up to 1.02 million characters. Additionally, if you convert a text document to Google Docs format, the file size limit is 50 MB.

Organizations with extensive visual documentation, video tutorials, or high-resolution diagrams quickly encounter storage constraints that require expensive upgrades or compromises in content quality.

Analytics and improvement limitations

Minimal usage analytics

Google Docs provides virtually no insights into how knowledge content is being used.

Administrators can't identify the most valuable resources, detect content gaps, or understand user search patterns. This blind spot prevents data-driven improvement of the knowledge base.

No feedback mechanisms

There's no built-in system for gathering user feedback on knowledge content quality or usefulness.

Without easy ways for users to rate content, flag outdated information, or suggest improvements, knowledge bases stagnate rather than continuously improve based on actual usage.

Limited audit capabilities

Google Docs lacks robust audit trails needed for compliance-sensitive knowledge.

Organizations in regulated industries struggle with inadequate logging of who accessed what information and when. This creates compliance risks when knowledge bases contain sensitive or regulated information.

While Google Docs excels as a collaborative document creation tool, it fundamentally lacks the architecture and features required for effective knowledge management. Organizations serious about capturing, organizing, and leveraging their collective knowledge need purpose-built solutions designed for these specific challenges.

By recognizing the limitations of repurposing Google Docs as a knowledge base, organizations can make more informed decisions about implementing systems that truly support their knowledge management goals. The right tool makes all the difference between a frustrating documentation repository and a valuable knowledge ecosystem that drives organizational success.

Why AllyMatter

AllyMatter provides a purpose-built knowledge management solution that addresses the fundamental limitations of Google Docs. Its intelligent architecture was designed specifically for creating, organizing, and sharing organizational knowledge.

The platform features a flexible taxonomy system with robust tagging and categorization capabilities, allowing information to be organized intuitively across multiple dimensions. Content can be interconnected through automatic relationship mapping, creating a true knowledge graph rather than isolated documents.

AllyMatter's powerful search engine understands the context and meaning behind queries, delivering relevant results regardless of exact wording. The system properly indexes all content types, including embedded media and attachments, ensuring nothing gets lost.

With built-in review workflows and knowledge-specific roles, AllyMatter ensures proper governance over organizational information. Content standards are maintained through enforced templates and content types tailored to different knowledge needs.

Perhaps most importantly, AllyMatter provides comprehensive analytics and feedback systems that enable continuous improvement of your knowledge base. Organizations can identify content gaps, understand usage patterns, and systematically enhance their knowledge assets over time.

A well-structured internal knowledge base is a game-changer for HR departments in growing companies. It serves as a central repository for critical information, streamlining HR processes, enhancing employee experience, and ensuring consistency in communication. Whether you’re a startup, a growth-stage company, or an enterprise, an HR knowledge base can significantly improve efficiency.

Here are some of the key ways an internal knowledge base can support HR functions, along with additional use cases that further demonstrate its impact.

1. Employee onboarding and training

Starting a new job can be overwhelming, but a structured onboarding process makes it smoother. Organizations with sophisticated onboarding programs are 103% more likely to see improvements in new hire retention and employee engagement, according to research by Brandon Hall Group. An internal knowledge base can centralize all onboarding materials, reducing information overload and giving new hires everything they need to get up to speed quickly.

• Provides new employees with step-by-step guides, checklists, and policies.
• Minimizes reliance on HR teams by answering common questions.
• Eliminates the hassle of searching through scattered emails and outdated documents.
• Enhances productivity from day one by reducing downtime.
• Increases retention by offering clarity and support throughout the onboarding process.

Example: Instead of emailing HR every time a new hire needs access to software tools, they can refer to an SOP in the knowledge base with step-by-step login instructions and access request guidelines.

2. Benefits and compensation

Understanding benefits and compensation is crucial for team members, but HR teams often get bombarded with repetitive questions. A knowledge base can provide clear, structured information about compensation plans and benefits.

• Centralized information on salary structure, bonuses, and incentives.
• Details on healthcare benefits, paid leave, and flexible work policies.
• Clear timelines for open enrollment and benefit changes.
• Reduces misunderstandings about pay and perks.

Example: Instead of waiting for HR’s response, an employee can instantly find details about their medical benefits, coverage limits, and claim processes in the knowledge base.

3. Company policies and procedures

Outdated policies can lead to confusion and compliance risks. A knowledge base ensures that all employees have access to the latest workplace policies and guidelines.

• Houses company policies, code of conduct, and workplace expectations.
• Reduces policy-related errors and misunderstandings.
• Easy to update so all employees access the latest information.

Example: A team member unsure about the company’s remote work policy can find a detailed breakdown in the knowledge base instead of emailing HR.

4. Performance management guidelines

Performance reviews can be complicated without standardized processes. A knowledge base simplifies performance tracking and feedback mechanisms.

• Outlines performance evaluation processes and criteria.
• Provides structured feedback templates and goal-setting frameworks.
• Stores past performance review records for reference.

Example: A manager conducting a quarterly review can quickly refer to the knowledge base for best practices on giving constructive feedback.

5. Compliance and legal requirements

Ensuring legal compliance is one of HR’s biggest responsibilities. A knowledge base acts as a single source of truth for legal guidelines and compliance policies.

• Houses labor laws, anti-discrimination policies, and workplace safety regulations.
• Ensures team members follow consistent guidelines.
• Reduces legal risk by keeping compliance documents easily accessible.

Example: An employee can check the knowledge base for workplace harassment policies and reporting procedures instead of asking HR.

6. Learning and development resources

A culture of continuous learning drives employee growth. According to the LinkedIn Workplace Learning Report, 94% of employees say they would stay at a company longer if it invested in their career development. A knowledge base fosters this by centralizing learning materials.

• Provides access to online courses, industry insights, and expert guidance.
• Helps employees upskill at their own pace.
• Enables HR to update and refine learning resources over time.

Example: A marketing team member looking to improve their copywriting skills can find recommended courses and templates in the knowledge base.

7. Exit and offboarding procedures

When employees leave, a structured offboarding process ensures a smooth transition. A knowledge base can help standardize exit procedures.

• Provides step-by-step guides for resignation and knowledge transfer.
• Stores exit interview templates and final checklist items.
• Ensures company assets and credentials are properly retrieved.

Example: An employee resigning can refer to an SOP that outlines how to return equipment, access final pay slips, and complete exit documentation.

8. Employee engagement and well-being programs

Happy employees contribute to a thriving workplace. HR teams can use a knowledge base to enhance employee engagement and well-being.

• Centralizes wellness program details, mental health resources, and engagement activities.
• Provides guides on work-life balance, stress management, and support programs.
• Improves participation in company events and well-being initiatives.

Example: A team member feeling overwhelmed can find mental health resources and counseling contacts directly in the knowledge base instead of searching for HR emails.

9. Internal job postings and career progression

A transparent career progression system keeps employees motivated and engaged. A knowledge base helps by centralizing internal job postings and career growth resources.

• Provides up-to-date listings of internal job opportunities.
• Outlines career progression frameworks and promotion criteria.
• Helps employees plan their career growth within the company.

Example: A team member looking for a leadership role can refer to the knowledge base to check eligibility criteria and required training programs.

10. Conflict resolution and workplace support

Workplace conflicts are inevitable, but structured resolution processes can help mitigate issues. An internal knowledge base provides clarity on handling workplace disputes and seeking support.

• Details conflict resolution policies and escalation procedures.
• Outlines workplace mediation options and HR contact points.
• Encourages a healthy and respectful work environment.

Example: If an employee faces a workplace dispute, they can refer to the knowledge base for steps to resolve the issue before escalating it formally.

An internal knowledge base is more than just a repository—it is a strategic tool that enhances efficiency, transparency, and employee experience. By centralizing critical HR processes, it reduces the burden on HR teams while ensuring employees have easy access to important information. From onboarding and compliance to career growth and workplace well-being, a well-maintained knowledge base supports every stage of an employee’s journey. As companies grow, maintaining structured and updated documentation becomes essential to scaling operations smoothly while fostering a positive work culture.

Imagine a company where expertise walks out the door with every departing employee. Tribal knowledge, accumulated over years, vanishes overnight. This was the reality for many organizations before the rise of internal knowledge documentation and sharing practices. Our journey through this history unveils a fascinating evolution, from hand-scribbled manuals to sophisticated digital platforms. We'll explore how businesses have tackled the challenge of capturing and disseminating valuable internal knowledge, ultimately fostering a more informed, efficient, and innovative workforce.

Before the internet and before even computers were commonplace across enterprises, the world was way different. Business environments were even more different. The way we used to store and share information required long periods of writing and recording. This was  followed by long weeks and months of training, or sometimes even years of partnering with someone experienced to understand how to accomplish tasks in a certain specific environment.

The Middle Ages had guilds where apprentices would work their entire life with a master to learn how to do something. This was a necessary step before you were allowed to work in that profession.

Things gradually changed after the Industrial Revolution which led to the rise of formalized apprenticeships and mentoring led by workers in the factory. 

The Cambrian explosion in enterprise knowledge sharing

Even before the advent of the internet and computers, there was a Cambrian explosion in the technology and methods to store and share enterprise knowledge or knowledge in general.

Before the advent of the internet, companies relied on various traditional methods to store and share internal information and processes. These methods included:

Paper-based documentation

Companies maintained physical records, such as printed manuals, handbooks, and file folders, to store information about policies, procedures, and best practices.

Filing cabinets and archives

Important documents and records were stored in filing cabinets, organized by department or topic. Larger organizations often had dedicated archives for long-term storage.

Binders and reference books

Compilations of important information, such as employee handbooks, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and product catalogs, were often kept in binders or printed as reference books.

Microfilm and microfiche

These film-based storage methods allowed companies to store large amounts of information in a compact format, which could be read using special viewing machines.

In-house libraries

Some larger organizations maintained in-house libraries that housed books, journals, and other reference materials relevant to their industry or operations.

Intranets

In the early days of corporate networks, before the widespread adoption of the internet, some companies set up internal networks (intranets) to share information electronically within the organization.

Bulletin boards and memos

Important announcements, updates, and information were often shared through physical bulletin boards in common areas or through printed memos distributed to employees.

Training sessions and workshops

Companies relied on in-person training sessions and workshops to share knowledge and best practices among employees.

Apprenticeships and mentoring

Experienced employees would often pass down knowledge and skills to newer employees through apprenticeships and mentoring relationships.

While these methods allowed for the storage and sharing of information, they often faced challenges such as limited accessibility, difficulty in updating and maintaining records, and the potential for information silos within the organization. 

A brief timeline of internal enterprise wikis

The history of enterprise internal wikis can be traced back to the early days of the World Wide Web and the development of collaborative online platforms. Here's a short timeline of the evolution of internal enterprise wikis:

• 1995 - Ward Cunningham develops the first wiki software, WikiWikiWeb, to facilitate collaborative document creation and sharing among programmers.
• 1999 - Jive Software is founded, which would later become a major player in the enterprise collaboration software market, offering tools like internal wikis.
• 2001 - Wikipedia, the world's largest online encyclopedia, is launched, demonstrating the power of collaborative knowledge sharing on a massive scale.
• 2002 - Socialtext, one of the first enterprise wiki platforms, is founded, providing businesses with a tool to create and manage internal wikis.
• 2004 - Atlassian launches Confluence, a popular enterprise wiki and collaboration platform that gains widespread adoption in the following years.
• 2005 - Microsoft introduces SharePoint, which includes wiki functionality as part of its enterprise content management and collaboration suite.
• 2006 - IBM releases Lotus Connections, an enterprise social software platform that includes wikis as a core feature.
• 2007 - Google launches Google Sites, a free wiki and web page creation tool, which is later incorporated into Google Workspace (formerly G Suite).
• 2008 - Wikis gain increasing popularity in enterprises as a means of internal knowledge management and collaboration.
• 2010s - Enterprise wiki platforms continue to evolve, integrating with other collaboration tools like chat, task management, and document sharing.
• 2013 - Atlassian goes public, reflecting the growing demand for enterprise collaboration software, including wikis.
• 2018 - Notion, an all-in-one workspace that includes wiki-like functionality, gains traction among businesses and individuals.
• 2020s - The COVID-19 pandemic accelerates the adoption of remote work and digital collaboration tools, further highlighting the importance of enterprise wikis for knowledge sharing and teamwork.

Throughout this history, enterprise internal wikis have evolved from simple collaborative document editing platforms to integral parts of comprehensive enterprise collaboration suites. Today, wikis continue to play a crucial role in helping organizations capture, organize, and share knowledge across teams and departments.

You've just welcomed three new team members, and your company's growth trajectory is exciting. But beneath the surface, a critical challenge is emerging—your internal knowledge base isn't keeping pace with your expansion. Documents are scattered across drives, process information is buried in email threads, and your new hires are spending their first weeks just trying to figure out where everything is.

You're not alone. While a well-organized internal knowledge base is the foundation of successful scaling, many fast-growing companies stumble when it comes to managing their documentation. In this post, we'll explore the common challenges that can derail your growth and show you how to build a knowledge management system that supports rather than hinders your expansion.

The Policy Transformation Minefield

When an employee moves from contractor to full-time status, an entire ecosystem of policies suddenly applies. What was once a narrow set of engagement terms expands to a comprehensive framework of organizational policies.

The contractor who previously followed project-specific guidelines now needs access to policies on paid time off, health insurance, retirement benefits, performance reviews, and internal conduct. Their intellectual property agreements shift from project-specific clauses to broader organizational protection.

This transformation creates a documentation challenge that intensifies with each new hire. Without a structured approach, you'll find yourself reinventing the wheel with every status change, consuming hours that should be spent on strategic growth.

The Document Verification Nightmare

Finding the right documents becomes a digital treasure hunt across disconnected systems. You dive into your HRMS platform, scroll through endless email threads, navigate folder mazes in Google Drive, explore SharePoint repositories, and send increasingly desperate messages to colleagues.

Each minute spent searching is a minute lost to productive work. For growing companies, this inefficiency isn't just frustrating—it's a direct impediment to scale. When multiple team members spend hours weekly hunting for documents, you're effectively paying a "disorganization tax" that compounds with each new hire.

The Version Control Conundrum

Even after finding what you think is the right document, the questions multiply: Is this truly the latest policy version? When was it last reviewed? Did someone accidentally modify a critical section? Has legal actually approved this version?

Each system becomes a potential information black hole. You find multiple versions of the same document with no clear indication which is current. This uncertainty creates real business risk – from using outdated legal language to enforcing policies that no longer align with your company's direction.

The Communication and Acknowledgment Quagmire

The Policy Distribution Dilemma

Even the most well-crafted policies fail if they don't reach the right people at the right time. In fast-growing companies, critical updates get buried in overflowing inboxes or lost in chat threads. When your sales team can't quickly find the latest pricing policy, or your support team is working from outdated customer service guidelines, the impact on your business is immediate and costly.

The Signature Collection Nightmare

Collecting necessary signatures becomes a logistical marathon. Employees print documents, sign them, scan them, email them back – a process that can drag on for weeks. There's no centralized tracking, no way to know where things stand without checking multiple sources. Each signature becomes a potential bottleneck in critical processes.

The Permissions and Access Puzzle

Changing an employee's status isn't just about paperwork – it involves complex access management. New email addresses must be created. Permission levels need recalibration. IT systems require updates. Each step involves different teams and different systems, with no central place to track completion.

This fragmented approach creates security risks and operational inefficiencies. New employees can't access what they need, while former employees sometimes retain access they shouldn't have. The resulting confusion creates both productivity drags and potential security breaches.

The Compliance Verification Challenge

Ensuring compliance becomes increasingly difficult as you scale. Has every employee received the latest security policy? Can you prove that required training was completed? The process of verifying compliance across multiple systems becomes enormously time-consuming.

For growing companies facing their first audits or compliance reviews, this challenge can be particularly daunting. What should be a straightforward process of collecting existing records turns into weeks of reconstruction and last-minute policy creation.

The Time and Resource Drain

What emerges is a process that's simultaneously complex and inefficient. Hours are consumed by tasks that should take minutes. Multiple team members get pulled into verification efforts. Communication fragments across systems. The potential for errors multiplies with each manual step.

Employee transitions become less about welcoming new team members and more about surviving administrative obstacle courses. This inefficiency scales with your company – becoming exponentially more challenging as you grow.

How Allymatter Solves These Knowledge Management Challenges

AllyMatter wasn't built just to store documents—it's designed specifically to help fast-growing companies overcome these common knowledge management pitfalls. Here's exactly how our platform addresses each challenge:

Unified Document Management

WYSIWYG Editor with Templates

Our intuitive editor includes pre-built templates for common documents, ensuring consistency and completeness. Each template includes suggested sections and sample language that you can customize for your needs.

Version Control with Change Tracking

Every edit is tracked and highlighted, making it easy to see how documents evolve and ensuring clarity about what's changed.

Smart Document Organization

Build structured, hierarchical documentation with clear categories and tags, helping employees find exactly what they need easily.

Stakeholder Input and Collaboration

Collaborative Review Workflows

Create custom approval flows involving multiple stakeholders, ensuring all relevant perspectives are captured before documents are finalized.

Comment and Feedback System

Stakeholders can provide targeted feedback directly within documents, with threaded discussions to resolve questions or concerns.

Tag-Based Access Control

Granular permissions ensure the right people are involved at the right stages of document development.

Effective Communication and Dissemination

Smart Notifications

Automated alerts notify relevant team members when documents are updated, with confirmation tracking to ensure receipt.

Centralized Access

A single source of truth for all documentation, accessible through an intuitive interface that works on any device.

Powerful Search

Advanced search capabilities help employees find relevant information quickly, with filters for department, category, and status.

Training and Education

Built-In Acknowledgment System

Track who has read and acknowledged each document, with automated reminders for those who haven't.

Version-Specific Training: 

Link training materials directly to document versions, ensuring employees always have access to relevant guidance.

Regular Reviews and Updates

Automated Review Reminders

Set review schedules for documents, with automatic notifications when updates are due.

Impact Analysis

Track which documents are most frequently accessed and where users might be struggling, helping you prioritize updates.

Change Management Tools

Set up structured processes for updating documentation, including approval workflows and automatic notification of affected employees.

Documentation and Record-Keeping

Comprehensive Audit trail

Every interaction with a document is logged, from views to acknowledgments to approvals.

E-Signature Integration

It provides secure, legally-binding signatures for documents that require formal acknowledgment.

Automated Compliance Reports

Generate reports showing document distribution, acknowledgment rates, and review status—perfect for audits and compliance reviews.

Beyond Features: The Allymatter Difference

While individual features are important, AllyMatter's real value comes from how these capabilities work together to create a seamless knowledge management experience. Our platform is built for growing companies, with the flexibility to adapt as your needs evolve and the simplicity to get started quickly.

We understand that knowledge management isn't just about documents— it's about creating a foundation for sustainable growth. That's why we've designed AllyMatter to be more than just a repository. It's a dynamic system that helps you build and maintain the structure your growing organization needs.

Making the Transition

Ready to transform your knowledge management? Getting started with AllyMatter is straightforward, and we're here to help every step of the way:

Don't let poor documentation management hold back your growth. Schedule a demo today to see how AllyMatter can help your organization scale with confidence.

What if your company could be 10% more efficient, not through hiring more people or working longer hours, but simply by organizing the knowledge that’s already within your team? The solution is simple—and it’s something most startups overlook: creating an internal wiki.

An internal wiki is a centralized hub that helps teams cut down on the time spent searching for information. Also known as corporate wiki, it allows the resident experts to share, knowledge management teams to store and newbies to learn effortlessly. 

Wiki takes virtually no effort to set up, scales as your team grows and can serve multiple purposes. This article walks you through the key benefits of creating an internal wiki, its impact on team efficiency and the best practices for setting it up. 

A deep dive into internal wiki for startups

Types of wikis

There are two types of wikis: private and public. 

Public wikis, or external wikis are internet sites developed for self-serving customers. Wikipedia is one of the best examples of public wikis. 

Private wikis,i.e., internal wikis, on the other hand, contain a repository of proprietary information like vacation policy, onboarding training materials, SOPs, company holiday calendar, employee information, and much more.

They are referred to as corporate wikis at an enterprise level and are mostly managed by knowledge management experts. There are three types of internal wikis: 

1. Company wiki
2. Team wiki
3. Partner and contractors wiki

What type of information can be stored in an internal wiki? 

Company wikis usually include: 

• How-to articles
• Product documentation
• HR rules and policies
• Training materials
• Meeting notes
• Team information
• SOPs

There’s practically no limitation to what you can store in your internal wiki. For example, a fintech company took the bold step of publishing their internal culture book online - initially created to guide their own teams. By sharing their core beliefs and operational values with the public, they strengthened their brand reputation, built customer loyalty, and boosted employee morale.

Benefits of creating an internal wiki

Turn your internal wiki into your startup’s digital brain 

Everything from past brainstorming sessions to crucial product decisions can be stored within the wiki. Instead of relying on one or two people who know everything, the whole team can tap into the wealth of collective knowledge.

💡 Pro Tip: Encourage employees to add “context” along with the information—why a decision was made or how something evolved. 

That said, sensitive information needs to be protected. While traditional wikis are not equipped to enable role-based access control, internal knowledge bases offer a much more sophisticated approach to documentation. You can grant or revoke access, add smart tags, custom categories, track audit trails, and much more on one dashboard.  

Read more about how small businesses and startups thrive by implementing an internal knowledge base here. 

Make Onboarding a Self-Serve Experience

Onboarding programs can be overwhelming, especially in startups where every team member wears multiple hats. Thorough onboarding documentation within your company’s internal wiki reduces the time senior team members spend on training newbies. 

💡 Pro Tip: Build an onboarding “track” in the wiki that includes important documents, team introductions, and even informal resources like company history. Include multimedia elements like video walkthroughs for a more engaging experience.

Create a Living Document for Company Culture

Your internal wiki isn’t just a place for procedures and product documentation—it can also serve as a living, breathing reflection of your company culture. By constantly updating the wiki with stories of success, lessons learned, and company milestones, you create a resource that captures the essence of your team’s journey. 

💡 Pro Tip: Dedicate a section of your wiki to “company wins,” where employees can share stories of triumph—big or small. This helps reinforce values and encourages a culture of recognition.

Templatize Repetitive Tasks

Startups are fast-paced environments, and one of the biggest time-wasters can be repeating the same tasks or rediscovering solutions to problems that have already been solved. An internal wiki helps eliminate this issue by documenting recurring tasks, troubleshooting steps, and common solutions. 

💡 Pro Tip: Create ‘How-To Guides’, ‘Ready-to-Use Templates’ and ‘FAQ’ sections in your wiki for tasks that come up regularly. 

Creating an internal wiki: Choosing the right platform

Several platforms offer internal wiki functionalities. When choosing one, consider the following:

• User-friendliness: Pick a platform that’s easy to navigate and update. This will encourage team members to use and contribute to the wiki regularly.
• Integration: Opt for a platform that seamlessly integrates with your existing tools like Slack, Trello, or Google Drive.
• Scalability: Your chosen platform should be able to accommodate growth. As your startup expands, so will your content.
• Security: Ensure the platform provides robust security features, allowing for permissions, authentication, and backup.

 Structuring your internal wiki

The structure of your wiki plays a pivotal role in its usability. Here’s a basic structure to begin with: 

• Company Overview: This can include mission, vision, core values, history, and any other relevant information that provides context about the company.
• Departments: Divide this into sections like marketing, sales, HR, product, and so on. Each department should have its own dedicated space.
• Processes and Procedures: Detailed guides on how specific tasks and operations are performed.
• Project Management: Information about ongoing projects, timelines, stakeholders, etc.
• Resources: This could include templates, research materials, and other essential tools.
• FAQs: Common questions about company operations, tools, or any other topic of relevance.

Best practices for setting up and maintaining the internal wiki

• Update Regularly: Appoint someone to be responsible for regular updates. Content that’s outdated can mislead and cause confusion.
• Encourage Contribution: Every team member is a repository of knowledge. Foster a culture where sharing is encouraged.
• Use Multimedia: Sometimes, a video or an infographic can explain a concept better than a wall of text. Use a mix of content types to keep the wiki engaging.
• Keep It Searchable: Ensure your content is easily searchable. Use tags, keywords, and a logical hierarchy.
• Maintain Consistency: Have a set format for how content should be presented. This makes the wiki look professional and easier to navigate.

How to measure the effectiveness of your wiki?

• Usage Metrics: Regularly monitor how often the wiki is accessed and which pages are most viewed.
• Feedback: Actively seek feedback from the team. Are they finding the wiki useful? What improvements do they suggest?
• Time Saved: Over time, you should see a reduction in the time taken for tasks like onboarding or finding key information.

In a world where there’s abundant information, drowning in it makes no sense. Having an organized knowledge base can make all the difference.  An internal wiki, when done right, turns into a dynamic tool that grows and evolves with your startup. 

Dive in, and you might wonder how your company ever managed without it! 

That said, traditional wikis are still no match for the sophisticated utility of internal knowledge base softwares. From automatic version control to built-in e-signatures, these solutions are a one-stop solution for all knowledge management needs. 

Fill out the form and we’ll walk you through a live demo of how AllyMatter can transform your startup’s knowledge management system. 

1.7 million workers are missing from the workforce compared to February 2020, and with ongoing layoffs impacting many companies, the loss of experienced employees has become a pressing concern. When teams shrink, businesses run the risk of losing valuable institutional knowledge. 

A defense contractor shared how an engineer’s exit led to substantial production delays for a company’s flagship product. The engineer worked with a tunneled vision, leaving little room for the organization to document her knowledge. Her exit meant the company lost access to her deep technical know-how.

As nearly three-quarters of CEOs predict a labor shortage that could disrupt businesses, companies can safeguard their collective memory by fostering a culture of continuous knowledge transfer and rewarding employees who contribute to strengthening this effort.

First things first: Evaluating knowledge

Institutional knowledge is typically classified into three categories: 

Explicit knowledge

Explicit knowledge refers to the information found in data files, training materials, publications, reports, CRM systems, and other on-cloud resources. It is the easiest to capture, manage, and preserve, as all of this can be done through internal knowledge management software without requiring direct person-to-person interactions.

Tacit knowledge

Tacit knowledge refers to undocumented information that is acquired through intuition and experience, like a tenured sales executive’s client intelligence. Knowing what to say to a particular client to close a sale comes from personal experience and understanding how customers respond to specific calls to action.

Implicit knowledge

Implicit knowledge like best practices and skills are personal. Knowledge transfer through training and interpersonal interactions is crucial here. 

In comparison to explicit knowledge, tacit and implicit knowledge is much harder to capture. The most efficient way to retain it is by integrating knowledge sharing with ongoing organizational practices. 

3 proven strategies for knowledge capture

Knowledge maps

K-maps within internal knowledge bases use graph-structured models to capture key objects, events, situations or concepts in a domain and their interrelationships by organizing them in a graph structure with nodes and edges. 

LinkedIn implemented this approach within their own customer service team, improving retrieval and response metrics and enhancing overall service effectiveness. Providing more factual and grounded responses reduced the median per-issue resolution time by 28.6%.

⏲️Implementation time frame: Short to medium

💡Pro tip: Create a visual representation of where employees can find experts and information within the enterprise. For maximum impact, ensure that it is flexible and evolves with company needs.  

⚠️Watch out for: 

• Overcomplication: Too many nodes or overly complex relationships can overwhelm users.
• Outdated Information: Ensure the knowledge map is regularly updated with new content and connections.
• Lack of User Adoption: Employees might resist using the map if it isn’t easily accessible and user-friendly.

Hackathons

Hackathons foster cross-functional interactions that accelerate the transfer of tacit knowledge, capture insights from experienced team members, and document solutions that turn into valuable assets for the organization. They provide an exciting way to eliminate knowledge silos across teams, even as individuals come and go.

Facebook has hosted over 50 internal hackathons since its inception, making them a key part of the company's culture. Besides team bonding, Facebook hackathons are proven to be crucial for discovery and innovation. Iconic platform features like ‘Donations’, ‘Safety Check’, and even the ‘Like’ button all originated from these events.

⏲️Implementation time frame: Medium

💡Pro tip: Invite employees to participate in internal competitions where they are given basic time and resources to develop ideas that solve problems based on their experience and knowledge. 

⚠️Watch out for: 

• Resource Constraints: Ensure there's enough support to bring innovative concepts to fruition.
• Idea Fatigue: Balance the frequency of events with sufficient downtime or follow-up to maintain excitement and creativity.
• Unclear Implementation Pathways: Set up processes to evaluate, refine, and implement the most promising concepts after the event.

Root cause analysis

RCA exercises led by experienced team members can help systematically identify underlying causes, capture critical insights and pass down problem-solving approaches on to new team members. By retaining the valuable expertise, companies can prevent recurring problems and increase decision-making accuracy. 

Reonomy, a real estate data platform, uses RCA to identify inefficiencies in data processing and software development. By analyzing customer feedback and internal issues, the team applies RCA to document solutions that helps preserve knowledge about data handling processes, and allows new developers to learn from past experiences.

⏲️Implementation time frame: Medium to long

💡Pro tip: Use the ‘5 Whys’ analysis method to dig deeper, and create visual documentation like flowcharts or cause-and-effect diagrams to represent these findings.

⚠️Watch out for: 

• Lack of Follow-Up: RCA should not be a one-time exercise. Without continuous updates to solutions, teams may fall into old habits.
• Overlooking Small Issues: Don’t ignore the smaller problems that could lead to bigger challenges later.

[Use cases] Institutional knowledge for small businesses

Keep your business from starting over every time

Employees may leave and roles can shift. That shouldn’t mean you reinvent the wheel with every new hire. 

🔍Case in point: Grubhub, a food delivery company, filmed training videos to help new drivers understand their roles in the first few days at work. An optimized onboarding process resulted in a 17.5% increase in first 30 day deliveries. 

🗝️ What can you do?

• Maintain an internal knowledge base: Create step-by-step guides for recurring tasks and document SOPs in one accessible location.

Read more: Check out how growing businesses benefit from powerful internal knowledge management. 

Create a culture of self sufficiency 

Every business has that one superstar employee running things smoothly. That doesn’t mean your business loses critical knowledge when they are unavailable. 

🔍Case in point: Trader Joe’s implemented a strategic mentorship program that pairs experienced store managers with high-potential assistant store managers. A structured internal promotion system resulted in 100% of Store Managers promoted from the Mate position and reduced the reliance on few individuals. 

🗝️What can you do?

• Implement Cross-Training: Ensure employees can fill in for each other to maintain continuity.

Stop Repeating Mistakes You've Already Learned From

Mistakes are inevitable. That doesn’t mean your business keeps building on a flawed foundation. 

🔍Case in point: Etsy implemented a system of ‘retrospectives’ after each platform update to document what went wrong and what was learned. An agile development system scaled their traffic 3X, connecting 2.5 million sellers with nearly 46 million buyers. 

🗝️What can you do?

• Create a failure log: Track mistakes and lessons learned from each project in a shared document or system, so future teams can avoid similar pitfalls.

Protect your team’s collective wisdom with AllyMatter

Every product is born out of a solution. A solution to a persistent problem. So is AllyMatter. 

The founding team of AllyMatter has witnessed the unique challenges growing businesses face first-hand - be that managing limited resources, scaling operations efficiently, or ensuring knowledge doesn’t walk out the door when employees do. AllyMatter was created to protect your most valuable asset: knowledge. 

Our platform helps takes the stress out of building and managing internal documentation with: 

Smart tags and customizable categories

Intelligent organization and powerful metadata search mean you'll never lose another file again.

End-to-end audit trail

Compare versions side-by-side, track all edits and approvals in one place for effortless compliance. 

Granular, simple access control

Add users, assign roles, and control permissions from one dashboard. 

Built-in e-signatures

Securely sign, approve, and manage documents without leaving the platform or needing extra tools.

Ready to see the AllyMatter difference in action? Join the waitlist and be among the first to get a live demo! 

A sales commission plan is the documented framework that nails the details down to every metric, threshold, and incentive structure. It communicates how you reward your sales team based on how much revenue they generate, how long it takes to close deals, and how risky the deals are. 

Poorly designed sales commission plans hinder sales force engagement and stifle the team’s ability to reach its full potential. A company that invests in optimizing its plan documentation focuses on what truly matters: driving revenue, expanding market share, and maximizing shareholder value, while eliminating the chaos and challenges of misalignment, inefficiency, and lack of clarity.

When handled poorly, even updating the sales commission plan—a seemingly simple task—can spiral into an organizational nightmare, draining resources, demoralizing the team, and potentially costing millions in lost revenue.

This article highlights the key challenges that lead to plan documentation chaos and offers practical solutions for boosting productivity.

#1 The Drafting Coordination Nightmare

Managing a sales commission plan involves more than drafting a few lines of text. It requires careful document coordination across various teams, multiple platforms, and countless revisions. In reality, versions of the document end up scattered between email threads, cloud drives, and hard drives. 

One person updates the Google Drive version, another sends out an email with changes, and someone else uploads an entirely different iteration to SharePoint. Soon, no one knows which version is final. Key edits can be missed, and sections of the document may vanish without a trace.

Solution: Centralized Collaborative Drafting

AllyMatter’s platform brings all document versions into one place. All edits are tracked in real-time, allowing teams to view the latest version and monitor changes made by each contributor. Version control is no longer a headache — you can see who made which changes, and access every draft instantly.

#2 The Approval Workflow Bottleneck

Long delays in the document approval process are a major drain on productivity and strategic momentum. When each reviewer takes days to get through their part, it results in a chain of delays that slows down the entire decision-making process, leaving critical updates buried in email inboxes and initiatives stalled.

The more prolonged the approval process, the harder it becomes to execute it properly, and maintain clarity on what needs to be done. 

Solution: Intelligent Workflow Management

AllyMatter streamlines the approval process by automating notifications to the next reviewer as soon as the previous review is complete. With real-time visibility into document status and automatic reminders, the process becomes faster and more transparent. Whether you need parallel or sequential reviews, workflows are fully customizable to fit your needs. What once took weeks now happens in days, eliminating delays and enabling faster, more efficient document approval.

‍

#3 Communication Breakdown

When different teams (HR, finance, sales, etc.) are working on the sales commission plan, communication lapses can easily occur. Updates can be missed, leading to confusion about the current version or misunderstanding of key information. The more individuals involved in the approval process, the greater the chances of miscommunication. 

This fragmentation can cause inefficiency and can ultimately make the sales commission plan difficult to implement effectively. Without clear communication, team members waste valuable time trying to get on the same page.

Solution: Integrated Communication Channels

AllyMatter embeds FAQs directly within the document, providing easy access to essential information. A centralized communication hub where team members can ask questions and get instant clarifications eliminates the need for endless email chains. With everything in one place, you can streamline collaboration and improve overall efficiency, keeping everyone aligned and informed.

#4 The Signature Nightmare

The final stage of policy release often becomes its own unique challenge. The need to print physical documents, manually track signatures, and maintain a clear overview of who has read, reviewed, or signed the document creates unnecessary friction. This process is not only time-consuming but also prone to errors, causing confusion and delays. As documents pass through various hands for approval, there’s no centralized system to provide clarity, leading to bottlenecks that prevent timely execution.

Take a sales team of 50 representatives for example, this uncertainty can have a significant impact on productivity. With an average monthly productivity of $20,000 per representative, even a 20-30% drop in efficiency during this waiting period translates to a potential revenue loss of $1-1.5 million. 

Solution: Comprehensive Signature Management

AllyMatter’s e-signature integration offers full visibility into every document's status, so you can track who has accessed, reviewed, and signed. Automatic reminders ensure no steps are missed, while a comprehensive audit trail provides transparency at every stage. 

#5 The Human Cost

Beyond the numbers, there are real human stories that illustrate the impact of a poorly managed sales commission plan. When employees don’t feel secure in their compensation, their morale, engagement, and performance take a hit, which can ripple throughout the entire organization.

This human cost goes far beyond just a few individuals; it affects team culture, retention rates, and the overall success of the business. The lack of transparency around compensation structures breeds doubt and disengagement, leaving employees questioning their value within the organization. It can result in turnover, loss of talent, and missed revenue opportunities, all of which come at a significant cost to both the people and the bottom line.

Solution: Organizational Transparency

By providing instant access to key information, your team will no longer be left in the dark. AllyMatter helps create a culture of clarity by transforming how your organization communicates critical information and reduces uncertainty.

Make strategic moves with AllyMatter

AllyMatter doesn’t just solve administrative challenges; it revolutionizes how organizations manage critical policy updates. With faster policy releases and reduced administrative overhead, your organization stays nimble and focused on growth. 

A protracted commission plan update isn’t merely an inconvenience—it’s a strategic liability that can cost your organization millions. Clear, instant communication boosts team morale and enhances performance, while significant cost savings optimize resource allocation. Eliminate delays, streamline workflows, and empower your team to drive success with AllyMatter. Join the waitlist today! 

Internal knowledge documentation plays a pivotal role in organizational success. In fact, organizations with fewer than 1,000 employees lose an estimated $2.7 million annually due to inefficient knowledge sharing. Businesses that implement effective communication and documentation practices can help employees save up to 20% of their time and boost productivity by 25-30%. 

At AllyMatter, our team of knowledge management experts is dedicated to helping businesses structure their internal knowledge systems. In this article, we share their expert insights, and the major benefits of building internal documentation that works.

Types of internal documentation 

Team documentation

Team-relevant documentation revolves around essential topics like style guides, meeting notes, talent schedules, status reports, team goals and timelines. It usually concerns people involved in a specific department. The information is gathered, created, and stored to serve their needs and is not accessible to the entire organization. 

Project documentation

Project-relevant documentation can include things such as proposals, design guidelines, product requirements, roadmaps, sketches, etc. This can often be the most used knowledge base in your organization and one that needs to be regularly reviewed. From including project plans to progress reports, it aligns stakeholders and ensures that all deadlines, deliverables and milestones are crystal clear. 

Reference documentation 

Reference documentation, in particular, focuses on educating teams about important topics, policies, and processes. This could include instructions for routine tasks, like submitting a vacation request or following compliance protocols. It serves as a single source of truth, ensuring employees can access accurate and consistent information when needed.

Onboarding documentation

Onboarding documentation involves details of company policies, organizational structure, general HR processes, etc. Getting acquainted with this information helps new employees get immersed in the regular work environment. All internal documentation should be integrated into the employee onboarding process from the start and serve as an ongoing reference for current employees. 

A culture of documentation captures valuable insider knowledge and makes it accessible to the entire team. By sharing this tribal knowledge, you break down silos, reinforce best practices, and ensure that employees can navigate unexpected challenges with confidence. 

How To Set the Ball Rolling On Internal Documentation?

A study of 1,001 U.S. employees from large organizations found that 42% believed the knowledge required for their work is specialized, while 58% felt the information they need is basic and readily accessible. Creating a centralized repository of your team's collective knowledge reduces reliance on individuals and ensures consistent access to information, regardless of employee turnover.

Here are the top document management tips from our experts: 

Keep it simple

The #1 rule for creating effective documentation is ensuring that employees can understand it without having to look up unfamiliar terms. Whether it's policies or strategic initiatives, the content should be clear and straightforward. Avoid jargon, acronyms, or overly complex language. Use section headings, bullet points, and concise sentences to make documents easily skimmable and accessible, as a rule of thumb. 

In addition, they should be easily searchable. Ease of searchability is a direct outcome of having a well-structured internal knowledge base in place. 

This is one of the biggest perks of AllyMatter. Smart tags, custom categories and powerful metadata search ensures that documents aren’t buried within dozens of folders. Instead, the page-tree structure helps your employees find documents instantly. Using straightforward language while naming documents also goes a long way in helping employees discover what they need. 

Dynamic documentation

Dynamic documentation is key to keeping up with the pace of continuous changes in a modern operations environment. Business challenges, goals, KPIs, teams and policies are ever-changing and the last thing you’d want to do when a process changes is to re-do or tweak a static document. Living documents are easy to evolve when your team is actively growing and adapting.

AllyMatter simplifies documentation and collaboration with intelligent approval workflows and comprehensive audit trails. 

Policy changes require significant time and effort, and wasting additional time on creating documentation only compounds the loss. With automated workflows, you can streamline approvals, ensuring faster, more transparent, and structured processes for critical documents.

‍

‍

On the other hand, end-to-end audit trails track every change for absolute accountability and effortless compliance.

‍

Set up secure access 

While it’s essential to make information focused enough to solve a problem, it’s equally important to provide need-based accessibility to certain documents. Sensitive information in internal documents must be protected to avoid data breaches and privacy issues. 

Role-based access controls ensure that only authorized individuals can view or edit critical documents. AllyMatter enables stakeholders to effortlessly balance strong security with seamless collaboration, allowing for granular access management and customized document access based on roles and departments. 

‍

With simplified user management, you can manage your entire knowledge base from one dashboard - be it adding users, assigning roles or controlling permissions.

Add visual aids

Examples and visuals bring clarity, so be sure to include them alongside your text. For instance, instead of simply explaining how to complete a mail merge for a customer outreach campaign, provide a step-by-step guide with screenshots from your last experience.

AllyMatter helps organizations break free from formatting hassles or tardy editors. A powerful WYSIWYG interface helps create professional documentation in minutes. Rich media support enables you to effortlessly embed images, videos, dynamic charts or graphs within your documents.

‍

Is internal documentation worth the investment? 

Creating internal documentation and setting up processes to foster such a culture is undeniably time consuming. It requires a consistent investment of 2-5 hours each week, at least in the beginning to properly track activities, update content, or simply ensure that the documentation is useful. 

While verifying processes, protocols, and policies requires your active involvement, AllyMatter streamlines the logistics, allowing you to focus on what matters most without getting bogged down by complex workflows. With built-in e-signatures—no extra tools needed—and secure commenting and version control that enhance collaboration, AllyMatter makes knowledge management effortless. 

Here are the top advantages of getting internal documentation right:

• ‍Increased productivity: By documenting key processes and important details, you prevent unnecessary roadblocks, helping employees stay on track and boosting overall productivity.‍
• Improved decision-making: Having clear documentation gives you a full view of any situation, allowing for informed decisions that drive growth and enhance team performance.‍
• Ease of knowledge sharing: With accessible documentation, employees can easily share insights and access information from colleagues, eliminating the need for constant one-on-one knowledge transfer.‍
• Streamlined onboarding: New hires can quickly get up to speed by leveraging the knowledge base, reducing the time and resources spent on training.

Whether you're beginning your internal documentation journey or seeking a more efficient solution, AllyMatter provides everything you need to create a knowledge base that truly empowers your team. Join the waitlist today and discover how simple it can be to build a documentation powerhouse.

The true value of a knowledge management system lies in its ability to evolve as your organization’s needs change. As companies scale, the complexity of managing information grows, and the tools you initially choose may no longer be sufficient to support new demands. The key is finding solutions that allow for both the organization of vast amounts of knowledge and the flexibility to adapt to new challenges as they arise.

In the previous editions of this series, we’ve explored a wide range of knowledge base platforms, each offering distinct features and capabilities. In Part 5, we’ll dive into the final set of tools, focusing on platforms that are designed to handle the intricacies of larger, more established organizations. By analyzing these solutions, we’ll guide you in selecting the knowledge management system that best fits your organization’s future growth, ensuring that your documentation remains streamlined, accessible, and scalable in the long term.

Our Analysis Scope

We cast a wide net when surveying knowledge base solutions, including dedicated documentation platforms and broader tools that offer knowledge base functionality. This article is part 5 of our four-part series analyzing global knowledge bases. Our core filter was straightforward: does the tool allow teams to create, organize, and share internal documentation?

This inclusive approach covered:

• Standalone knowledge base platforms
• Wiki-style tools
• Documentation features embedded in larger workplace solutions

We included specialized documentation tools as well as broader collaboration platforms, tracking everything from simple document repositories to advanced systems with workflow automation and AI capabilities. This broad perspective provides context about where each tool fits in the wider knowledge management landscape.

The resulting analysis covers everything from focused documentation tools like Slab and Outline to more comprehensive platforms like Confluence and ClickUp, which include knowledge base features as part of their broader offerings. Rather than making assumptions about what you need, we lay out what each platform offers so that you can match capabilities to your requirements.

Understanding Our Analysis

For each platform, we gathered key information across several dimensions to help guide your decisions:

Feature Alignment

We assess the feature set of each platform to see how closely it matches core knowledge base needs. Some tools focus primarily on documentation, while others bundle knowledge base capabilities into a broader toolkit. Recognizing this helps you avoid paying for unneeded features or ending up with an overly complex solution.

Content Quality Support

We evaluate how each platform supports content creation and maintenance, including its editing interface, template systems, and tools for keeping documentation up to date. We also examine how well each platform organizes content—an essential factor when your documentation expands beyond basic needs.

Pricing Structure

We look at base costs, per-user fees, and any significant pricing tier jumps. We pay close attention to how pricing scales and whether features like Single Sign-On (SSO) require premium tiers—often a hidden cost in many solutions.

Technical Implementation

We review:

• Whether the solution is open source
• Available integrations
• Browser extension availability
• AI capabilities
• Design quality and user interface
• Sharing and collaboration features

We also provide general notes on unique features, limitations, and specific use cases where each tool shines or might fall short. Rather than making direct recommendations, we present this information so you can determine which features align with your needs and growth trajectory.

Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

Here’s part 5 of the list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization.

Knowmax

Knowmax is a knowledge management platform tailored for contact centers and support teams. It offers features like decision trees, articles, and visual guides for quick and consistent customer service.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Knowmax is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, designed to be a dedicated knowledge management system.

Why You Might Like It

• Decision trees for troubleshooting and guided resolutions
• Visual guides enhance step-by-step support instructions
• Analytics to identify usage patterns and performance improvements
• Omnichannel—content accessible via chatbots, web, mobile

Potential Considerations

• Focus on contact center might be more specialized than general KB needs
• Pricing can be enterprise-focused but is not publicly available
• Limited project management or extensive wiki features

HappyFox

HappyFox is a help desk and customer support platform that includes a knowledge base feature to provide self-service support. Articles can be organized by category, and the platform integrates with ticketing for context-based resolutions.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, HappyFox is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—part of a help desk suite but can be used to host a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified ticketing + KB for consistent support experiences
• User-friendly editor and drag-and-drop organization
• Analytics to see which articles help deflect tickets
• Branding options for a customized knowledge center

Potential Considerations

• Focused on external customer support—limited purely internal features
• Cost can escalate with help desk seat licensing. Pricing is based on a per agent basis.
• Less suitable for complex internal documentation or large wikis

Docmost

Docmost is a documentation and knowledge sharing tool that focuses on a clean, minimal interface and easy organization of topics. It offers real-time collaboration, tagging, and version control to maintain a dynamic repository.

Key Information

• Open Source?  Docmost is open source and is offered under a GNU Affero General Public License.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s designed as a knowledge base/documentation platform.

Why You Might Like It

• Minimal, clean UI for distraction-free writing
• Collaboration with inline comments and shared editing
• Tag-based organization to help users find content quickly
• Version history to track changes over time

Potential Considerations

• Less known than major KB vendors—fewer integrations might be available
• Pricing - Free to use. 
• Lacks specialized features (like workflow approvals or advanced analytics)

MadCap Software

MadCap Software specializes in technical communication and content development tools. Its flagship product, MadCap Flare, is used to create online help, manuals, and knowledge bases with single-sourcing and multi-channel publishing capabilities.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, MadCap is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, MadCap Flare can produce comprehensive documentation portals.

Why You Might Like It

• Single-sourcing: Author content once, publish to multiple formats (HTML, PDF, etc.)
• Robust authoring environment with conditional content and variables
• Advanced features like topic-based authoring, snippets, and CSS styling
• Integration with source control (Git, Subversion) for team workflows

Potential Considerations

• Steep learning curve for new authors and advanced features
• Desktop-based software—collaborative editing requires additional setup
• Pricier compared to simple web-based KB solutions. Starts at $234 per user per month when billed annually but that is for Authors. 

Typemill

Typemill is a lightweight, flat-file CMS designed for documentation and websites. It uses Markdown files and offers a clean UI for editing and organizing content, making it suitable for small-to-mid-sized knowledge bases.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Typemill is open source but do read the license before implementing.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, but you must self-host the generated site.

Why You Might Like It

• No database required—flat-file storage simplifies hosting
• Minimalist editor for Markdown content
• Customizable themes for a polished look
• Version management through Git or manual file backups

Potential Considerations

• Setup requires hosting and some technical skill
• Fewer plugins/extensions compared to larger open-source CMSs
• Less suited for enterprise or multi-team collaboration
• Additional plugins are charged. The ‘Maker’ and ‘Business’ Licenses are 22 and 122 Euros per year. 

Apryse

Apryse (formerly PDFTron) provides document processing and collaboration solutions, focusing on PDF editing, annotation, and digital workflows. While it’s not a traditional KB platform, organizations can store documentation and collaborate on documents within Apryse’s environment.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Apryse is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not really—primarily a document processing/SDK platform, but can host docs.

Why You Might Like It

• Advanced PDF manipulation for forms, annotations, conversions
• Collaboration features like real-time marking and commenting
• Cross-platform SDKs for integrating doc workflows into apps
• Security features (redaction, encryption) for sensitive docs

Potential Considerations

• Not built for a typical knowledge base structure
• Pricing and licensing complexities for SDK usage
• Requires development if you want custom integrations or workflows

Heretto

Heretto is a content management system for structured authoring, particularly using DITA (Darwin Information Typing Architecture). It’s popular in technical writing teams needing advanced capabilities for structured documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Heretto is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though specialized for structured (DITA) documentation.

Why You Might Like It

• DITA-based structured content for consistency and reuse
• Single-sourcing across multiple outputs and channels
• Collaboration features for teams of technical writers
• Workflow with content reviews, approvals, and versioning

Potential Considerations

• Requires knowledge of DITA and structured authoring practices
• Overkill if you just need simple KB pages or articles
• Higher cost typically targeting enterprise-level documentation teams

Elium

Elium is a knowledge-sharing platform for teams and organizations, offering a central library of documents, wikis, and discussions. It supports rich media content, tags, and permission controls, aiming to foster collaborative knowledge building.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Elium is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s designed as a dedicated knowledge-sharing solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Modern, intuitive UI to encourage user engagement
• Tagging and filtering for quick content discovery
• Version history and editorial features for team collaboration
• Integration with tools like Slack, Microsoft 365, and Google Workspace

Potential Considerations

• Less known than major players, so fewer third-party integrations
• Pricing depends on team size and feature requirements. Starts at 18 Euros per user per month for a minimum of 10 users. Offers a corporate and enterprise plan as well.
• Not specialized for developer docs or complex workflows

LabiKnow

LabiKnow is a platform focused on delivering in-app guides, tooltips, and a knowledge base for SaaS products. It aims to reduce support tickets by providing just-in-time help to users within the application interface.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, LabiKnow is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can serve as a KB, especially for customer-facing SaaS support.

Why You Might Like It

• In-app guidance for onboarding and feature discovery
• Knowledge base integration with tooltips and widgets
• Analytics on user engagement with help content
• Non-technical setup with a visual editor for tooltips and guides

Potential Considerations

• Primarily external, SaaS user focus—less for internal usage
• Pricing starts at $39 per month. Has $159 and $399 per month plans available
• Limited advanced documentation capabilities outside in-app help

LayupLabs.ai

LayupLabs.ai (also referred to as “Layup Labs”) appears to be a platform offering AI-driven solutions for content and knowledge management. (Note: Public info is limited, so please verify details.)

Key Information

• Open Source? No.
• Standalone KB Tool? Possibly, depending on how their AI-based knowledge management is structured.

Why You Might Like It

• AI-driven approach to organize or generate documentation
• Potential integrations with existing knowledge repositories
• Focus on automation could reduce manual content creation overhead
• Could be specialized for certain industries or content types

Potential Considerations

• Limited public details—requires direct contact or trials for clarity
• Might be new or in early-stage development
• Pricing and feature set unclear without more vendor info

IT Glue

IT Glue is a documentation platform designed for Managed Service Providers (MSPs). It organizes client data, procedures, passwords, and other assets in a structured, secure manner.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, IT Glue is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, but heavily specialized for IT and MSP scenarios.

Why You Might Like It

• Centralized asset management: track networks, credentials, software licenses
• Automation: integration with RMM and PSA tools for real-time updates
• Security: granular access controls and version history
• MSP-oriented for quick onboarding of client data

Potential Considerations

• Niche focus—less relevant outside IT service contexts
• Pricing can be premium in the MSP market segment. $29, $36 and $42 for Basic, Select and Enterprise versions respectively.
• Learning curve for teams unfamiliar with MSP workflows

ConvergePoint

ConvergePoint offers compliance and policy management software built on Microsoft 365 and SharePoint. While not strictly a KB tool, it helps companies manage policies, procedures, and related documents in a centralized repository.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, ConvergePoint is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Partially—focused on policy management within Microsoft 365.

Why You Might Like It

• Compliance tracking: ensures policies are reviewed and acknowledged
• Automated workflows for policy creation, approvals, and revisions
• SharePoint integration leverages existing Microsoft ecosystem
• Audit trails to track changes and user acknowledgments

Potential Considerations

• Policy management approach may be too specialized for general KB needs
• Requires SharePoint—not suitable if you don’t use Microsoft 365
• Complex for simple documentation or non-regulated environments

BetterDocs

BetterDocs is a platform (or service) that helps create and manage documentation on WordPress and Shopify.

Key Information

• Open Source? No.
• Standalone KB Tool? Potentially, if it offers a full doc management solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Could offer a structured approach to organizing and publishing docs
• Focus on ease-of-use could shorten setup time
• Possible templating for consistent formatting

Potential Considerations

• Pricing starts at $52 for a single license. Has a $112 and a $224 plan as well for additional sites. 

Dualo

Dualo (or “Dualo.io”) is described as a platform for digital adoption, offering in-app guides and training. It may also provide a knowledge portal for product instructions or onboarding materials.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Dualo is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Primarily digital adoption/in-app guides, but can have KB functions.

Why You Might Like It

• In-app training and step-by-step guidance
• Knowledge repository for users to find detailed instructions
• Provides onboarding and launch strategy support
• Analytics to see user engagement with guides
• Potential integrations with existing web apps

Potential Considerations

• Not a classic KB—focuses on user onboarding and training
• Pricing might scale with usage or seat count
• Requires user buy-in to utilize embedded guides effectively

HelpKit

HelpKit is a tool that transforms Notion pages into a help center or knowledge base. It syncs content from Notion automatically, so updates in Notion reflect on the live help site.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, HelpKit is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Operates as a layer on top of Notion, so somewhat dependent on Notion.

Why You Might Like It

• No extra editing interface—just use Notion, which many teams already do
• Automatic syncing keeps published docs updated in real time
• Custom branding options to match your site’s look and feel
• Search function that indexes Notion content

Potential Considerations

• Must have Notion—not ideal if you don’t already use it
• Limited advanced features (like version history, approvals) beyond Notion’s native capabilities
• Pricing adds to any existing Notion subscription costs. Starts at $15 per site per month. Also has a $31 and $63 pe site per month for additional team seats and articles and features. 

Tango

Tango is a browser extension and desktop application that automatically generates step-by-step guides by recording users’ on-screen actions. It’s designed to simplify the documentation of processes and procedures, turning workflows into clear tutorials without manual screenshots or text descriptions.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Tango is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, you can use Tango’s generated guides as standalone documentation, though you may integrate them into an existing knowledge base or wiki.

Why You Might Like It

• Automated documentation: Instantly captures workflows as you perform them
• Step-by-step guides with annotated screenshots and instructions
• Editing tools allow you to refine or remove steps, add notes, and customize visuals
• Easy sharing: Export guides as PDFs, links, or embed them in other platforms

Potential Considerations

• Limited “traditional” KB features (e.g., advanced search, hierarchical organization)
• Primarily process-focused rather than an all-encompassing knowledge repository
• Pricing may vary based on team size and advanced feature requirements. Has a free version, otherwise $20 per pro user per month for more than 15 workflows and desktop capture. 

Antora

Antora is a static site generator designed specifically for creating multi-repository docs sites using AsciiDoc. It’s popular in technical circles for producing well-structured documentation and versioned component sites.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Antora is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, you self-host the generated site, typically from Git repos.

Why You Might Like It

• AsciiDoc-based for rich, semantic documentation
• Multi-repository approach letting you organize large doc sets by component
• Versioning built in to handle docs for multiple product versions
• Theme customization for branding and layout

Potential Considerations

• Developer-centric with a learning curve for AsciiDoc and build pipelines
• No built-in real-time collaboration—docs stored in Git or other VCS
• Overkill for small teams or non-technical doc needs

Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, you might opt for a focused platform. If you require broader project management or collaboration features, a more comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can grow with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

Building a knowledge management system that scales effectively requires more than just the right tools—it requires tools that can evolve with your business while supporting growing teams and more complex workflows. As your organization continues to expand, the challenge is ensuring your knowledge base remains organized, accessible, and functional without slowing down your progress.

In Parts 1, 2 and 3 of this series, we reviewed a variety of knowledge base solutions, highlighting key features and their capabilities. In Part 4, we continue our exploration, focusing on a new set of tools that offer unique features designed to support larger teams and more dynamic content management needs. By examining these platforms, we’ll help you identify which solutions can best streamline your documentation process, foster better collaboration, and grow with your company’s expanding needs.

Our Analysis Scope

We cast a wide net when surveying knowledge base solutions, including dedicated documentation platforms and broader tools that offer knowledge base functionality. This article is part 4 of our four-part series analyzing global knowledge bases. Our core filter was straightforward: does the tool allow teams to create, organize, and share internal documentation?

This inclusive approach covered:

• Standalone knowledge base platforms
• Wiki-style tools
• Documentation features embedded in larger workplace solutions

We included specialized documentation tools as well as broader collaboration platforms, tracking everything from simple document repositories to advanced systems with workflow automation and AI capabilities. This broad perspective provides context about where each tool fits in the wider knowledge management landscape.

The resulting analysis covers everything from focused documentation tools like Slab and Outline to more comprehensive platforms like Confluence and ClickUp, which include knowledge base features as part of their broader offerings. Rather than making assumptions about what you need, we lay out what each platform offers so that you can match capabilities to your requirements.

Understanding Our Analysis

For each platform, we gathered key information across several dimensions to help guide your decisions:

Feature Alignment

We assess the feature set of each platform to see how closely it matches core knowledge base needs. Some tools focus primarily on documentation, while others bundle knowledge base capabilities into a broader toolkit. Recognizing this helps you avoid paying for unneeded features or ending up with an overly complex solution.

Content Quality Support

We evaluate how each platform supports content creation and maintenance, including its editing interface, template systems, and tools for keeping documentation up to date. We also examine how well each platform organizes content—an essential factor when your documentation expands beyond basic needs.

Pricing Structure

We look at base costs, per-user fees, and any significant pricing tier jumps. We pay close attention to how pricing scales and whether features like Single Sign-On (SSO) require premium tiers—often a hidden cost in many solutions.

Technical Implementation

We review:

• Whether the solution is open source
• Available integrations
• Browser extension availability
• AI capabilities
• Design quality and user interface
• Sharing and collaboration features

We also provide general notes on unique features, limitations, and specific use cases where each tool shines or might fall short. Rather than making direct recommendations, we present this information so you can determine which features align with your needs and growth trajectory.

Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

Here’s part 4 of the list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization.

Stonly

Stonly is a platform for creating interactive guides, tutorials, and step-by-step documentation. It aims to simplify user onboarding and troubleshooting, and can also serve as a knowledge base by organizing these guides into a searchable library.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Stonly is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though it specializes in interactive, step-by-step guides.

Why You Might Like It

• Interactive, branching guides for clear user journeys
• Embeddable widgets so you can place help content within apps or websites
• Analytics on guide completion and drop-off points
• Customization with branding and step layouts

Potential Considerations

• Not a traditional text-based KB—focuses on guided experiences
• Pricing is not publicly available although they have separate plans for small businesses and enterprises
• Less suited for large sets of static documentation or policy manuals

ClickHelp

ClickHelp is a documentation platform geared toward creating technical documentation, user manuals, and online help centers. It allows multiple authors to collaborate, with features like version control, variables, conditional content, and branding options.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, ClickHelp is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, built specifically for software documentation and manuals.

Why You Might Like It

• Multi-author collaboration with review workflows
• Version control for tracking changes between documentation releases
• Conditional content and variables for creating different document variations
• Branding and customization to match your product or corporate identity

Potential Considerations

• Primarily technical docs—might be overkill for simple wikis or internal knowledge sharing
• Learning curve for features like conditional text or single-sourcing
• Pricing scales with user seats and advanced authoring capabilities. Starts at $175 for starter, $285 for Growth and $580 for Professional based on 2 contributors. Per contributor charge are applied for additional contributors based on the plan chosen

HelpNDoc

HelpNDoc is a help authoring tool (HAT) allowing teams to create CHM, HTML, PDF, and Word documentation from a single source. While it’s typically used to produce software documentation or manuals, it can double as a knowledge base solution when hosted online.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, HelpNDoc is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Typically a help authoring tool, but can generate a knowledge base portal.

Why You Might Like It

• Single-source authoring to produce multiple output formats
• WYSIWYG editor with easy-to-use interface
• Template-based approach to keep documentation consistent
• Media library to manage images, videos, and attachments

Potential Considerations

• Windows-only desktop application (for authoring)
• Lacks collaborative real-time editing—usually a solo author approach
• Not designed as a live, always-online wiki unless you host output yourself
• Pricing - Has plans for $102, $311 and $511 for the Standard, Professional and Ultimate editions. Has separate floating licenses as well. 

BMC Helix Knowledge Management

BMC Helix is an IT service management suite, and its Knowledge Management module provides an integrated KB system for resolving support tickets and sharing solutions across teams. It’s oriented toward large enterprises needing robust ITIL processes.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, BMC Helix is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Part of the BMC Helix ITSM suite, but can function for knowledge management alone.

Why You Might Like It

• ITIL-aligned for organizations with formal ITSM processes
• Advanced workflow for article creation, review, and publishing
• Integration with incident and problem management modules
• Analytics to measure knowledge usage and resolution rates

Potential Considerations

• Enterprise-level solution with corresponding costs
• Complex setup typically requiring BMC specialist knowledge
• Less suitable if you’re not running an ITSM environment

inSided by Gainsight

inSided by Gainsight is a community and knowledge management platform allowing companies to combine self-service support, user forums, and a knowledge base in one place. It targets SaaS and subscription businesses that want to build active user communities.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, inSided is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, although community forums are a core part of the solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Community-driven approach with user-generated knowledge
• Q&A and discussions that feed into reusable KB articles
• Integration with Gainsight’s customer success platform
• Analytics to monitor community engagement and article effectiveness

Potential Considerations

• Focus on external, customer-facing communities rather than purely internal docs
• Pricing tailored for mid-to-large SaaS organizations. On request.
• Requires a strategy for community moderation and engagement

Monday.com Docs

Monday.com, known for project management, also offers Docs as part of its platform. Teams can create collaborative documents, embed boards or tasks, and link to other Monday.com items, potentially using Docs as a knowledge repository.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Monday.com is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of Monday.com’s broader work management suite.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified platform for tasks, docs, and workflows
• Real-time collaboration with mentions and comments
• Easy linking to Monday.com boards, tasks, or dashboards
• Templates to standardize recurring document types

Potential Considerations

• Primarily project-focused—docs might lack advanced KB features (e.g., robust search, versioning)
• Cost can escalate if you add many users or advanced features. Starts with a free version, then advanced paid plans at $9 to $19 per user per month. Enterprise plans available. That’s for the entire ecosystem though. 
• Learning curve if you’re unfamiliar with the entire Monday.com ecosystem

Docsie

Docsie is a cloud-based documentation tool that helps teams write, manage, and publish technical or product documentation. It focuses on structured content, with collaboration features that allow multiple contributors to work on shared docs.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Docsie is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can be used as a standalone knowledge base or help center.

Why You Might Like It

• Version control: Keep track of doc iterations and roll back if needed
• Collaboration: Multiple authors can edit and comment in real time
• Embedding & publishing: Easily embed docs on your website or export them
• Content reuse: Reuse snippets across multiple documents to save time

Potential Considerations

• Pricing scales with the number of docs or users. Starts at $143 per month and goes up to $449 per month excluding the enterprise plan.
• Less robust than some enterprise-grade platforms if you need extensive workflow approvals
• Limited integrations compared to more established documentation suites

Shelf

Shelf is a knowledge management platform geared toward eliminating bad data across your documentation and data sources. The way this tool perceives ‘knowledge management’ is different from the others. It offers AI-powered search, content organization, and analytics to optimize article usage.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Shelf is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes and No. Shelf has a centralized knowledge hub at its core though.

Why You Might Like It

• AI-driven search: Surfaces the most relevant documents for agents
• Automated content curation: Identifies outdated info and suggests updates
• Collaboration features: Allows team members to share feedback and improve docs
• Analytics: Track which articles are most (or least) used and measure agent performance

Potential Considerations

• Focus on customer support rather than broad internal documentation
• Enterprise-level pricing can be high for smaller organizations although pricing is not publicly available
• Learning curve for teams new to AI-based knowledge tools

Spekit

Spekit is a digital enablement and knowledge platform that integrates with popular tools like Salesforce, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. It provides context-sensitive help “speks” (bite-sized content) that appear when and where users need them.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Spekit is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though it focuses on in-app guidance rather than traditional wiki pages.

Why You Might Like It

• Contextual training: Delivers targeted knowledge within the apps your team already uses
• Real-time updates: Speks can be edited on the fly and instantly pushed to users
• Integrations: Seamlessly works with Salesforce, Slack, and more
• Analytics: Measure engagement and knowledge retention through usage metrics

Potential Considerations

• Not a classic documentation repository—it’s more of an in-app help system
• Pricing scales with usage and the number of connected integrations. Pricing is also not available publicly
• May require user buy-in to adopt a new “speks” format

LivePro

LivePro is a knowledge management platform aimed at customer-facing teams, especially in contact centers. It focuses on delivering quick, consistent answers and tracking user engagement to continuously improve support content.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, LivePro is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s a dedicated platform for knowledge management.

Why You Might Like It

• Decision trees and guided workflows for consistent agent responses
• User feedback integrated into articles for continuous improvement
• Multichannel support (web, phone, chat) so the same knowledge is accessible everywhere
• Analytics to track usage and uncover gaps in documentation

Potential Considerations

• Primarily contact center focused—could be more than you need for simple internal docs
• Pricing typically fits enterprise or midsize businesses but pricing is not available publicly. Offer ‘Flex’, ‘Premium’ and enterprise plans though.
• Limited project collaboration features outside of the knowledge base context

BetterMode

BetterMode (formerly “Tribe”) is a community platform that can also serve as a Q&A or discussion-based knowledge base. It supports community-driven knowledge creation where users can ask, answer, and organize information.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, BetterMode is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s a community platform with KB-like features (Q&A, discussions).

Why You Might Like It

• Community-driven content creation and curation
• Modular architecture allowing custom apps, widgets, and integrations
• Gamification with badges, points, and leaderboards for increased engagement
• Custom branding to align the community with your organization’s identity

Potential Considerations

• Less structured for traditional documentation—primarily Q&A and forums
• Requires moderation to keep content organized and accurate
• Pricing is dependent on the number of ‘collaborators’. Between $19 to $99 per month for 3 to 10 collaborators respectively. Free plan and Enterprise plans available.

Mintlify

Mintlify is a documentation platform specifically aimed at developers. It provides a clean interface, code blocks, search, and integrations with popular tools, making it easy to write, deploy, and maintain technical documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Mintlify is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s designed for developer-focused docs.

Why You Might Like It

• Developer-centric with syntax highlighting, code samples, and CLI tools
• Version control integration (e.g., GitHub) for workflow automation
• Responsive, modern templates suitable for API and software docs
• Search optimized for technical content

Potential Considerations

• Narrow focus on developer documentation, not general wiki usage
• Limited advanced features like interactive tutorials or branching logic
• Pricing may become costly for large engineering teams. Pricing is dependent on the number of editors, offer two plans - $150 and $500 per month for 5 and 20 editors each. Has a free ‘Hobby’ plan and offers an Enterprisre plan. 

HelpDocs

HelpDocs is a documentation platform designed for public help centers and internal wikis. It offers a clean, minimal interface with features like categories, tagging, and a powerful search function.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, HelpDocs is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, dedicated to building knowledge bases.

Why You Might Like It

• Instant deployment with customizable themes and domain mapping
• Category-based organization for intuitive navigation
• Analytics and feedback to understand how users interact with content
• Multilingual support for global audiences

Potential Considerations

• Primarily text-based—less suited for complex internal processes or SOPs
• No built-in advanced workflow beyond basic publishing
• Pricing is $69, $139 and $279 per month. Discounts for paying annually upfront. 

bit.ai

bit.ai is a modern document collaboration platform that can be used as a knowledge base. It supports rich media embedding, real-time editing, and organization via workspaces and folders.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, bit.ai is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can serve as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Embeds for videos, Google Docs, spreadsheets, and more
• Real-time collaboration with inline comments and mentions
• Smart workspaces to separate teams or projects
• Templates for quick creation of docs like project briefs, SOPs, etc.

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced features like version branching or complex approvals
• Pricing has a free plan, a Pro Plan and a Business Plan for $8 and $15 per member per month. 
• Less suitable for large enterprises needing extensive customization

Read the Docs

Read the Docs is a popular documentation hosting service, primarily used by open-source communities and developers. You can automatically build and host docs from a Git repository, making it ideal for code-related or developer-focused documentation.

It also has a great user community at Write The Docs

Key Information

• Open Source? The hosting service is proprietary, but the underlying software (Sphinx) is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, but specifically geared toward technical documentation.

Why You Might Like It

• Automated builds from GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket
• Versioning tied to your code branches
• Built using Sphinx/Markdown for powerful doc formatting
• Free hosting for open-source projects

Potential Considerations

• Primarily developer-oriented rather than a general KB solution
• Less intuitive for non-technical users but highly feature rich
• Limited custom UI—the main style is the classic Sphinx doc theme
• Pricing - $150 per month for Advanced Plan and $250 per month for Pro Plan. Enterprise Plan available

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is an open-source static site generator focused on building documentation websites quickly. It offers Markdown-based doc creation, versioning, and a React-based theming system.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Docusaurus is open source. Uses a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, but you need to host or deploy the generated site.

Why You Might Like It

• Markdown-based content creation for simplicity
• Versioning system that aligns with software releases
• React-based theming for customizable UI
• Large community and strong documentation

Potential Considerations

• Requires some technical setup (Node.js, command-line tools)
• No built-in collaboration—docs are typically in a Git repo
• Focus on developer docs might not be as user-friendly for non-technical teams

MkDocs

MkDocs is an open-source static site generator written in Python, designed for creating project documentation from Markdown. It’s known for simplicity and fast builds, with a range of custom themes available.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, MkDocs is open source. Do read the license before you start using it though. 
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, you can build and host a KB site, but it’s static.

Why You Might Like It

• Markdown-based for quick, straightforward doc writing
• Fast, simple builds that generate lightweight static sites
• Theme support including the popular “Material for MkDocs”
• Git integration to track doc changes over time

Potential Considerations

• Static site approach means no built-in database or dynamic editing features
• Requires technical setup (Python, CLI) to build and deploy
• Not ideal for large teams needing real-time collaboration or editorial workflows

KnowledgeBase.com

KnowledgeBase.com is a SaaS platform focused on delivering customer-facing help centers or internal wikis. It offers a simple editor, categorization, and analytics to measure article performance.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, KnowledgeBase.com is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s built for knowledge base creation.

Why You Might Like It

• Easy to set up with minimal technical overhead
• Category management for organizing articles
• Built-in analytics to see popular content and search queries
• Customization for branding and domain usage

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced features like workflow automation or version control
• Pricing is simple. $49 per month when paid annually or $59 when paid monthly. 
• Less suitable for large enterprises with complex documentation needs

Doctave

Doctave is a documentation platform that integrates with Git. It’s designed to help teams write, review, and publish technical docs, offering automated builds, search, and a user-friendly interface over a Git repo.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Doctave is proprietary
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s primarily for creating and hosting docs or KB content.

Why You Might Like It

• Git-based workflow for version control and collaboration
• Automatic builds and hosting for docs with minimal setup
• Search and organization features that scale with your repo
• Clean, minimal design focusing on readability

Potential Considerations

• Technical knowledge needed to manage Git-based doc pipelines
• Limited non-technical user features for editing or WYSIWYG formatting
• Pricing might grow with team size or advanced usage with a wide variance - $99, $399 and $1000 per month.

Glean

Glean is an AI-powered workplace search and knowledge management platform. It connects to multiple apps (Google Workspace, Slack, Confluence, etc.) and unifies them under a single search interface, helping users quickly find relevant information.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Glean is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not exactly—it’s more of a unified search and knowledge discovery layer.

Why You Might Like It

• Universal search across various third-party services
• AI-driven recommendations surface relevant content proactively
• User-friendly interface that consolidates scattered info
• Administration controls for access and permissions

Potential Considerations

• Not a content-creation tool—relies on existing docs from integrated sources
• Pricing not public
• Requires robust integrations for maximum effectiveness

Atlas (by ClearPeople)

Atlas is a digital workspace and knowledge management platform built on Microsoft 365. It enhances SharePoint functionalities with additional features for content governance, collaboration, and enterprise search.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Atlas is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s an add-on/overlay for Microsoft 365 and SharePoint.

Why You Might Like It

• Extended SharePoint capabilities for advanced knowledge management
• Easy to navigate project workspaces and organizational resources
• Integrated with Microsoft 365 for seamless authentication and file handling
• Governance and compliance features that exceed out-of-the-box SharePoint

Potential Considerations

• Requires Microsoft 365 & SharePoint environment already in place
• Enterprise-level pricing may be overkill for smaller teams. Starts at $2500 per month
• Complex setup that might need partner or consultant support

Axero Solutions

Axero Solutions offers a platform called “Communifire,” which is an intranet and collaboration suite that includes knowledge base functionality. It aims to unify company news, documents, discussions, and Q&A into a central hub.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Axero is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Part of a broader intranet suite, but can be used for KB purposes.

Why You Might Like It

• Intranet + KB combination for holistic internal communications
• Built-in collaboration features like blogs, wikis, forums, and Q&A
• Permissions and content moderation for secure, organized sharing
• Branding and design customization to match corporate identity

Potential Considerations

• Might be too extensive if you only need a basic wiki
• Higher-tier pricing for enterprise features but not public.
• Learning curve for administrators and end users

TWiki

TWiki is a structured wiki application written in Perl, designed for enterprise collaboration. It has strong plugin support, user access controls, and a flexible framework for building custom wiki applications.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, TWiki is open source. Uses as GNU GPLv3 License.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it functions as a self-hosted wiki solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Structured data approach allows for form-based pages and custom fields
• Extensible plugin ecosystem to add features
• Fine-grained access control for enterprise security needs
• Proven track record used by organizations for many years

Potential Considerations

• Perl-based—less common environment compared to PHP or Node
• Older UI might feel dated without customization
• Setup can be complex, requiring command-line and server knowledge

Interested to know more? Click here to read part 5 of this series. 

‍Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, you might opt for a focused platform. If you require broader project management or collaboration features, a more comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can grow with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

Building and maintaining an effective knowledge base often goes beyond selecting the right software—it’s about how you implement and scale that system as your organization evolves. What starts as a simple repository of documents often becomes a tangled web of outdated content, miscommunication, and disjointed workflows. In our experience, the real challenge isn’t just in finding a tool—it’s in establishing a system that grows with the company without hindering the flow of information or collaboration.

Part 1 and Part 2 of this series gave us an overview of companies providing knowledge management solutions. In Part 3, we build on that analysis, expanding the list of tools and solutions that facilitate content creation, version control, and knowledge sharing, and how they can help your organization streamline its documentation process. By presenting the capabilities of each solution, we’ll help you determine which platform is best suited to your current needs while preparing for future growth.

Our Analysis Scope

We cast a wide net when surveying knowledge base solutions, including dedicated documentation platforms and broader tools that offer knowledge base functionality. This article is part 1 of our four-part series analyzing global knowledge bases. Our core filter was straightforward: does the tool allow teams to create, organize, and share internal documentation?

This inclusive approach covered:

• Standalone knowledge base platforms
• Wiki-style tools
• Documentation features embedded in larger workplace solutions

We included specialized documentation tools as well as broader collaboration platforms, tracking everything from simple document repositories to advanced systems with workflow automation and AI capabilities. This broad perspective provides context about where each tool fits in the wider knowledge management landscape.

The resulting analysis covers everything from focused documentation tools like Slab and Outline to more comprehensive platforms like Confluence and ClickUp, which include knowledge base features as part of their broader offerings. Rather than making assumptions about what you need, we lay out what each platform offers so that you can match capabilities to your requirements.

Understanding Our Analysis

For each platform, we gathered key information across several dimensions to help guide your decisions:

Feature Alignment

We assess the feature set of each platform to see how closely it matches core knowledge base needs. Some tools focus primarily on documentation, while others bundle knowledge base capabilities into a broader toolkit. Recognizing this helps you avoid paying for unneeded features or ending up with an overly complex solution.

Content Quality Support

We evaluate how each platform supports content creation and maintenance, including its editing interface, template systems, and tools for keeping documentation up to date. We also examine how well each platform organizes content—an essential factor when your documentation expands beyond basic needs.

Pricing Structure

We look at base costs, per-user fees, and any significant pricing tier jumps. We pay close attention to how pricing scales and whether features like Single Sign-On (SSO) require premium tiers—often a hidden cost in many solutions.

Technical Implementation

We review:

• Whether the solution is open source
• Available integrations
• Browser extension availability
• AI capabilities
• Design quality and user interface
• Sharing and collaboration features

We also provide general notes on unique features, limitations, and specific use cases where each tool shines or might fall short. Rather than making direct recommendations, we present this information so you can determine which features align with your needs and growth trajectory.

Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

Here’s part 3 of the list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization:

Documize

Documize is a documentation and knowledge management platform that blends wiki-style pages with structured data. Its interface allows both technical and non-technical teams to collaborate, organize, and search content efficiently.

Key Information

• Open Source? Documize offers both open-source (Community) and paid Enterprise editions.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can function as a standalone, self-hosted or cloud-based knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Hybrid approach: Combines wiki pages with structured documentation
• Powerful search that indexes all content, including attachments
• Role-based permissions to control who can view, edit, or share docs
• Integration with tools like Slack and GitHub for streamlined workflows

Potential Considerations

• Setup can vary based on self-hosted vs. cloud versions
• Learning curve for advanced features like templating and structured fields
• Enterprise features (e.g., SSO, auditing) may require paid tiers. Zerbase is $20 per editor per month, Community edition starts at $900 per year for 100 users and Enterprise edition is $1800 per year for unlimited users.

openKM

openKM is an open-source document management system (DMS) that can also serve as a knowledge repository. It provides version control, workflow automation, and metadata tagging, making it useful for organizing large volumes of documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes and No, openKM has an open-source Community Edition alongside a commercial version. Licensing is not very clear though.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though it’s more of an enterprise DMS with robust KB capabilities.

Why You Might Like It

• Document-centric approach with comprehensive version management
• Metadata and taxonomy features for advanced organization
• Workflow engine for document approvals and reviews
• Full-text search across multiple file types

Potential Considerations

• Primarily a DMS—could be overkill if you only need a simple wiki
• Requires technical setup and maintenance for self-hosting
• Interface is less streamlined than newer SaaS KB tools

BlueSpice

BlueSpice is a professional, enterprise-grade distribution of MediaWiki (the software behind Wikipedia). It adds an improved user interface, WYSIWYG editing, role-based permissions, and additional extensions for a more polished, corporate-friendly wiki experience.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, based on MediaWiki with open-source extensions. BlueSpice itself is not open source but is built on an open source tool.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s a dedicated wiki/KB platform.

Why You Might Like It

• Familiar MediaWiki foundation with enterprise enhancements
• Extended features such as quality management, PDF export, and workflow tools
• WYSIWYG editor removes the need for wiki markup expertise
• Active community plus commercial support options

Potential Considerations

• Still a wiki model—might feel too “Wikipedia-like” for some teams
• Server hosting and configuration can be time-consuming
• Extension management requires attention to updates and compatibility
• Pricing is complex but starts at 2700 Euros or so per year.

Google Sites

Google Sites is a free website-building tool within Google Workspace. While not a traditional KB platform, many organizations use it to create simple internal documentation sites due to its easy integration with Google Docs, Sheets, and Drive.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Google Sites is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of Google Workspace, but can serve as a lightweight KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Seamless integration with Google Drive, Docs, Sheets, and Slides
• Drag-and-drop site creation—no coding required
• Real-time collaboration with built-in Google account management
• Free for Google Workspace users (depending on plan)

Potential Considerations

• Limited customization compared to full-fledged KB systems
• No advanced features like version control or workflow automation
• Requires Google account—could be an issue if you need external sharing at scale

ServiceNow Knowledge Management

ServiceNow Knowledge Management is a module within the ServiceNow platform, widely used for IT service management (ITSM). It lets teams create and manage a knowledge base for internal support, customer self-service, or both, complete with workflows and approvals.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, ServiceNow is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? It’s part of the ServiceNow suite, but can be used primarily for knowledge management.

Why You Might Like It

• ITSM integration: Ties directly into incident, problem, and change management
• Workflow engine for content review, approval, and publishing
• Advanced analytics to see how content is used and identify gaps
• Role-based access for precise control of knowledge visibility

Potential Considerations

• High cost typically aimed at enterprise IT departments
• Complex implementation—setup and customization can require consultants
• Less relevant if you’re not using ServiceNow for broader IT or customer support

Trainual

Trainual is a platform designed primarily for onboarding and process documentation. Businesses can store SOPs, training modules, and reference guides, creating a centralized knowledge base for new hires and ongoing training.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Trainual is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s specifically focused on process documentation and training.

Why You Might Like It

• Structured “playbook” approach for consistent onboarding
• Quizzes and tests to verify understanding of content
• Templates for common workflows and SOPs
• Integrations with apps like Zapier, Slack, and Gusto

Potential Considerations

• Primarily training-oriented features outside of training and SOP contexts

Scribe

Scribe automates documentation by recording user actions in real time, then generating step-by-step guides or tutorials. It’s useful for quickly capturing processes without manually writing everything out, though it can also serve as a lightweight internal knowledge tool.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Scribe is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? It functions best as a process documentation add-on; can be used alongside or as a simple KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Automated capture of procedures into step-by-step instructions
• Browser extension for easy process recording
• Quick editing to annotate or highlight important steps
• Sharing options (URL links, PDFs, or embed in other docs)

Potential Considerations

• Niche focus on process docs rather than broad knowledge management
• Limited content structure (mostly sequential tutorials)
• Subscription pricing that can add up if many users need to record processes. The basic version is free. Paid plans start at $12 per seat per month and Pro Personal is $23 per seat per month. 

Whale

Whale is a process and knowledge management platform aimed at small to medium-sized businesses. It specializes in creating step-by-step SOPs, checklists, and how-to guides, then distributing them to team members for consistent execution.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Whale is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though heavily focused on SOPs and process documentation.

Why You Might Like It

• Centralized processes and SOPs for uniform training
• Interactive guides with images, videos, and embedded elements
• Analytics to see who has read or acknowledged certain procedures
• Integrations with apps like Slack and Microsoft Teams

Potential Considerations

• Not a traditional wiki—it’s best for process-oriented documentation
• Pricing can scale with additional features or user seats
• Less suited if you need a deep hierarchy of general knowledge articles
• Pricing - Free for up to 5 users, Scale plan is $149 per month for 10 users, additional users are $15 per month. Enterprise plans available

TiddlyWiki

TiddlyWiki is a unique, open-source wiki tool contained in a single HTML file. It allows users to create a self-contained knowledge base or note-taking system that can be run locally or hosted, making it extremely portable.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, TiddlyWiki is open source. Uses the BSD 3 Clause License
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, fully contained in one file—though it can be hosted on a server if desired.

Why You Might Like It

• Portable “single file” approach—easy to move or share
• Highly customizable with plugins, macros, and custom themes
• Lightweight and can run in a browser without a database
• Version control possible by saving multiple iterations or using Git

Potential Considerations

• Less intuitive for teams used to multi-user online wikis
• Collaboration is limited without additional setup (e.g., TiddlyWeb, Git)
• Not designed for large enterprises with hundreds of users

eGain Knowledge

eGain Knowledge is a solution tailored for customer service and contact centers, offering a robust knowledge base with AI-driven search and guided help. It integrates with CRM systems and provides content usage analytics to continuously refine documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, eGain is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, but it’s specialized for contact center and support use cases.

Why You Might Like It

• AI-driven search to quickly find relevant articles or solutions
• Guided process flows for troubleshooting or customer interactions
• Content analytics to see how often articles are used and their effectiveness
• Multi-channel support (chat, email, phone) so agents can access the same KB

Potential Considerations

• Enterprise focus can lead to higher costs
• Overkill if you just need a simple internal wiki or doc library
• Implementation might require consulting if integrating with multiple CRMs

Flowlu

Flowlu is a business management suite offering project management, CRM, and knowledge base modules. The built-in knowledge base allows you to create and categorize documentation, enabling team members to reference information within the same platform they use for daily tasks.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Flowlu is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of a larger suite, but the KB module can be used on its own.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified workspace with projects, CRM, and knowledge base in one
• Category-based organization of articles for easy navigation
• Collaborative editing for team-based content creation
• Free tier available (with user and feature limitations)

Potential Considerations

• Broader toolset might be more than you need if you only want a KB
• Pricing scales with user count and advanced features. Free version available. Paid plans range from $49, $99, $199 and $329 per team per month. Teams are either 8, 16, 25 or more respectively.
• Less specialized than dedicated documentation platforms

ServiceWare Knowledge (prev. Sabio)

Sabio is a knowledge management platform built for service teams, offering AI-assisted search and a clean, modern interface. It focuses on quickly surfacing the most relevant information to agents and employees, aiming to reduce response times and improve customer satisfaction.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Sabio is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Sabio primarily provides a knowledge base system.

Why You Might Like It

• AI-driven search that prioritizes relevant articles
• Simple, modern UI that teams can adapt to quickly
• Role-based permissions to segment and secure sensitive content
• Reporting on usage trends and article effectiveness

Potential Considerations

• Geared toward service environments—might have extra features you don’t need for internal-only docs
• Pricing typically targets mid-to-large companies
• Less robust for non-service workflows (e.g., developer documentation)

Upland RightAnswers

RightAnswers by Upland is a knowledge management solution for customer support and IT service management. It integrates with various ticketing systems and uses an AI-enabled search engine to help agents find the right solutions.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Upland products are proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though often paired with help desk systems.

Why You Might Like It

• Ticketing integration with tools like ServiceNow, Salesforce, or Zendesk
• AI-enabled content that suggests relevant solutions during ticket creation
• Robust analytics to track article usage and resolution rates
• Multiple content types: documents, FAQs, videos, and more

Potential Considerations

• Enterprise focus typically comes with higher pricing tiers
• Implementation can require professional services for optimal setup
• Overkill if you just need a basic internal wiki without service desk integration
• Pricing is not public 

Knowledge Center by USU

Knowledge Center by the USU Group is a knowledge management platform tailored for contact centers, IT support, and self-service portals. It provides a structured approach to authoring, reviewing, and delivering consistent information across channels.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, it’s a proprietary solution.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, with specialized features for support environments.

Why You Might Like It

• Content lifecycle management with approvals, feedback loops, and version control
• Intelligent search and guided troubleshooting for call center agents
• Multichannel publishing (web, chatbots, portals) for unified information delivery
• Analytics to identify content gaps and optimize knowledge usage

Potential Considerations

• Specialized for contact center and IT use cases
• Costs can be significant for full enterprise deployments
• Less suitable for simple or informal internal documentation needs

Teamwork Spaces

Teamwork Spaces is an add-on to the Teamwork project management suite. It focuses on creating and organizing internal wikis and documentation so teams can collaborate within the same environment where they track tasks and projects.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Teamwork is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Part of the Teamwork ecosystem, but can function as a wiki/KB module.

Why You Might Like It

• Seamless integration with Teamwork projects, tasks, and timelines
• Structured page hierarchy for storing and organizing information
• Inline commenting for contextual feedback on documents
• Access permissions can be synced with project teams and roles

Potential Considerations

• Not ideal if you don’t use Teamwork for project management
• Pricing requires at least a Teamwork subscription plus add-ons. Plans start at $10.00, $19.99, $54.99 per user per month. Free and Enterprise plans available
• Less specialized than dedicated KB platforms with advanced doc features

Kayako

Kayako is a customer service and help desk platform that includes a knowledge base module. It supports external help centers or internal wikis, offering article templates and a unified interface for both customers and support agents.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Kayako is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—part of a help desk suite, though the KB can be used on its own.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified help desk with tickets, live chat, and knowledge base in one platform
• Article templates to speed up documentation creation
• Customer-facing portal plus internal documentation features
• Real-time search to surface articles during ticket creation or agent replies

Potential Considerations

• Primarily customer support-focused—may have more features than you need for simple internal docs
• Pricing can add up if you need multiple agent seats or advanced support features. Starts at $49 per agent per month. Enterprise plans available
• Less robust for broader collaboration or complex internal knowledge structures

Intercom Articles

Intercom Articles is part of the broader Intercom customer messaging platform. It allows you to create a knowledge base of help articles that can be embedded within live chat conversations, providing self-service support for customers or internal teams.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Intercom is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of Intercom’s suite, but the Articles feature can serve as a KB solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Contextual knowledge: Surface relevant articles during chat sessions
• Simple editor for quick content creation and updates
• Analytics to measure article performance and identify gaps
• Integration with Intercom’s other communication tools for a unified support experience

Potential Considerations

• Pricing can grow quickly with advanced Intercom features. Offers discounts for startups. 
• Primarily customer-facing rather than strictly for internal docs
• Less robust as a full-scale internal wiki for broad organizational knowledge

MangoApps

MangoApps is a digital workplace suite combining intranet, team collaboration, and knowledge management. Its knowledge base module lets teams create wikis, share documents, and centralize resources in a structured way, complete with social features for engagement.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, MangoApps is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—a broader platform, but it can serve as a KB hub.

Why You Might Like It

• All-in-one intranet plus knowledge base and collaboration tools
• Social features like feeds, comments, and likes to engage employees
• Granular access controls and version tracking for documents
• Mobile-friendly so users can access content on the go

Potential Considerations

• Potentially overwhelming if you only want a simple KB
• Pricing can be higher than single-function tools. Minimum of 200 user licensing required. 
• Learning curve for non-technical staff unfamiliar with integrated suites

Evernote Teams

Evernote Teams (formerly Evernote Business) extends the popular note-taking platform for team-based collaboration. It allows shared notebooks, tags, and a global search function that can serve as a lightweight organizational knowledge base.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Evernote is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Primarily a note-taking platform, but can be repurposed as a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Familiar interface for users already acquainted with Evernote
• Cross-platform syncing across web, mobile, and desktop
• Powerful search that can parse text in images and PDFs
• Shared notebooks for group collaboration and referencing

Potential Considerations

• Limited structure for large-scale or highly complex documentation
• Paid tiers required for advanced collaboration and storage. Personal and Professional plans are designed for individual use. Team plans start at $24.99 per user per month. Enterprise plans available.
• Not built with formal approval workflows or version control in mind

Joomla

Joomla is a popular open-source content management system (CMS) that can be configured to act as a knowledge base or wiki-like site. Through extensions, you can add documentation structures, article management, and advanced access controls.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Joomla is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, if configured with documentation or wiki extensions.

Why You Might Like It

• Flexible CMS with thousands of extensions for added functionality
• User management built-in for assigning different roles and permissions
• Large community offering free support, tutorials, and theme options
• Self-hosted for full control over data and customization

Potential Considerations

• Setup and maintenance require web hosting and some technical knowledge
• Might need multiple plugins or extensions to replicate a classic KB experience
• Less streamlined than dedicated SaaS KB solutions

Drupal

Drupal is a highly flexible, open-source CMS used to build complex sites and applications. With the right modules, you can create robust knowledge bases featuring advanced taxonomy, user permissions, and search capabilities.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Drupal is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though typically requires modules and configuration to act as a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Highly customizable with a powerful module system
• Strong community for support, updates, and contributed extensions
• Granular taxonomy for organizing large, complex sets of content
• Scalability for enterprise-level sites and high traffic

Potential Considerations

• Steep learning curve for new administrators or content builders
• Requires hosting, installation, and ongoing maintenance
• Overkill if you only need a simple, out-of-the-box knowledge solution

Happeo

Happeo is an intranet and collaboration platform with features designed to consolidate company news, documents, and knowledge into a single hub. It supports structured pages, channels, and integrations with Google Workspace, making it useful for knowledge sharing.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Happeo is proprietary.
• Standalone KB Tool? Primarily an intranet solution, but can be adapted for a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• User-friendly pages to publish and organize company information
• Integration with Google Drive for file and document embedding
• Social features: channels, feeds, comments, and likes
• Analytics to see which content is most viewed or engaged with

Potential Considerations

• May be more than you need if you want only a lightweight KB
• Pricing is not public but aimed at mid-to-large organizations
• Limited advanced wiki features for detailed document versioning or approvals

Interested to know more? Check out part 4 of this series.

‍Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, you might opt for a focused platform. If you require broader project management or collaboration features, a more comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can grow with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

Running a business today means staying on top of many priorities. One of the most crucial of these priorities  is how you handle information. As your business grows, keeping track of what you know, who knows it, and making sure everyone can access the right information becomes vital. That's where standalone knowledge bases come in. They're designed to do one thing really well: manage all your company's knowledge.

Unlike sprawling platforms that try to cover multiple functions, standalone knowledge bases are purpose-built for information sharing, offering a streamlined and efficient approach.

This guide will explore everything you need to know about standalone knowledge bases, from understanding their fundamental concepts to choosing and implementing the right solution for your organization.

What is a Standalone Knowledge Base?

A standalone knowledge base is a dedicated software solution designed primarily for documenting, organizing, and sharing information within an organization. It differs from knowledge base modules integrated into larger software suites, such as help desk systems or project management tools. Instead, a standalone knowledge  focuses exclusively on knowledge management, offering more robust features and greater flexibility in this specific domain.

The key characteristic of standalone knowledge bases is their independence—they can function without requiring other software systems. This focused approach often results in more refined documentation features, better search capabilities, and more intuitive knowledge organization tools.

Knowledge bases, by design, are built to serve multiple purposes, depending on their use case. Some are designed to support internal employee needs, some act as a guide to clients using your product, and some function as the database of knowledge for chat bots. 

Larger software suites are sometimes built for these specific purposes, such as chat bots to help your customers using an inbuilt knowledge base. However, they often lack seamless integration with different knowledge sources— for example, technical documents—that can provide more comprehensive answers to customer queries. 

While these larger suites might serve your specific use case, a standalone knowledge base is more valuable from an informational architecture perspective. It offers better integration and stronger information management capabilities. 

Why Choose a Standalone Knowledge Base?

Organizations opt for standalone knowledge bases for several compelling reasons:

Focused Functionality

Unlike all-in-one solutions, standalone knowledge bases excel at their primary purpose—documentation and knowledge sharing. This specialization typically results in better search capabilities, more intuitive organization, and more robust documentation features.

Greater Flexibility

Standalone solutions often offer more customization options. They integrate with your existing tools, so you are not locked into a specific ecosystem.

Scalability

As your organization grows, standalone knowledge bases can adapt without the complexity of scaling an entire suite of tools.

Cost-Effectiveness

When you only need knowledge base functionality, standalone solutions often prove more economical than paying for a full suite of features you won't use.

Better User Experience

With interfaces designed specifically for documentation and knowledge sharing, standalone solutions offer a more intuitive experience for both content creators and consumers.

How did we choose the tools in this guide?

Standalone

We choose tools that are truly standalone. They should not have been part of a larger suite for customer service, product support, contact center or any other suite. 

No Dependency

Tools must function independently. They should not require another tool or platform, such as M365 or Notion. 

Popularity & Maturity

They should have a reasonable user base and product maturity to serve its intended purpose, i.e. a knowledge base to be used for internal and external facing users. 

Essential Traditional Features

They should have traditional features, such as the ability to let users create a knowledge base page, edit it, and publish it. The ability to organize them into a coherent structure is also essential. 

Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

Below is a large list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization.

Outline

Outline is an open-source knowledge base platform using a Business Source License 1.1, designed for team documentation and collaboration. The platform offers hierarchical document organization with nested collections, real-time editing capabilities, and a built-in search engine for content discovery. Outline provides both cloud hosting and self-hosting options, with features like version history, document templates, and integrations with workplace tools like Slack and Zapier.

Slite

Slite is a dedicated documentation platform featuring a chat-based interface, designed for creating and organizing internal knowledge. The platform provides folder-based document organization, real-time collaborative editing, and threaded comments for team discussions. Slite also offers desktop applications for document access, built-in templates for common document types, and keyword-based search functionality.

Nuclino

Nuclino is a lightweight knowledge base solution that enables offering real-time collaboration for teams building wikis and documentation. The platform uses a visual, card-based workspace for organizing content, along with features for interlinking pages and creating content relationships. Nuclino provides simultaneous editing capabilities, in-line commenting, and instant search functionality across all documents.

Document360

Document360 is a dedicated knowledge base platform that enables organizations to create, manage, and publish documentation for both internal teams and external customers. The platform features a markdown-based editor, category-based organization, and version control capabilities, along with built-in analytics to track documentation performance. Document360 provides customizable themes for branding and supports multiple domains, making it suitable for businesses requiring separate knowledge bases for different products or audiences.

Helpjuice

Helpjuice is a knowledge base and documentation platform focused on easy knowledge sharing and content management. The platform features a powerful search engine with predictive capabilities, customizable templates, comprehensive analytics to track user engagement, and tools for maintaining content quality. Helpjuice supports real-time collaboration, version control, multiple content formats, and access control settings. It also integrates seamlessly with popular business tools.

BookStack

BookStack is an open-source knowledge management platform that emphasizes design and usability. It features a WYSIWYG editor within a structured Book, Chapter & Page format. The platform includes draw.io integration, powerful search capabilities, and page revision control. BookStack prioritizes intuitive content creation while offering advanced features for power users.

DokuWiki

DokuWiki is an open-source wiki platform that operates without a database, storing content in text files. The platform features access control lists for permissions, a plugin system for extending functionality, and built-in version control. DokuWiki supports multiple language content, offers customizable templates, and includes automated link creation.

Wiki.js

Wiki.js is a modern, open-source wiki platform built on Node.js. It offers multiple editing interfaces and content organization options. The platform also provides Git-based version control, modular authentication systems, and extensive search capabilities. Wiki.js features a responsive interface, supports multiple languages, and offers various rendering engines for content display.

KnowledgeOwl

KnowledgeOwl is a standalone knowledge base platform focused on both internal and external documentation. The platform features a user-friendly editor, customizable themes, and category-based article organization. KnowledgeOwl includes built-in migration services, analytics for tracking content usage, and templating tools for consistent documentation.

XWiki

XWiki is an open-source wiki platform designed for building comprehensive knowledge base solutions. The platform features extensive customization through plugins, granular access control systems, and version tracking for all content. XWiki supports structured data management, offers multiple editor options, and includes advanced search capabilities.

HelpDocs

HelpDocs is a customer support platform focused on knowledge base creation and management. It offers customizable branding options, analytics tools, and team collaboration features. The platform integrates with tools like Intercom and Slack, includes a built-in text editor, and provides detailed user engagement metrics for content optimization.

KnowledgeBase.com

KnowledgeBase.com is a SaaS platform dedicated to knowledge base creation and management. The platform provides straightforward article organization, built-in analytics for tracking content performance, and customizable branding options. KnowledgeBase.com offers category management tools, search functionality, and domain customization features.

Doctave

Doctave combines content management with automated documentation processes. The platform features search functionality, clean content organization, and supports multiple documentation formats. Doctave provides automated builds for documentation, version control, and a minimal design focused on readability.

Docmost

Docmost is an open-source documentation platform focusing on clean interface design and content organization. The platform provides real-time collaboration features, version control for document tracking, and tag-based content organization. Docmost includes commenting capabilities, search functionality, and supports multiple content types.

Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, a focused platform is sufficient. IFor broader project management or collaboration features, a comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can scale with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

An internal knowledge base is a valuable asset for any organization, acting as a central hub where employees can access crucial information. However, simply creating a knowledge base isn’t enough — maintaining it over time is where the true value lies. 

A well-maintained knowledge base can boost productivity, improve communication, and empower your team to succeed. But with changing processes, evolving teams, and shifting priorities, keeping it updated can be a challenge. 

This article offers expert tips to help your knowledge base remain a valuable resource for your organization in the long term, along with practical solutions that directly tackle the core challenges.

The ongoing need for updates

An internal knowledge base is a living, breathing resource. What’s accurate today may not be relevant tomorrow. Information can quickly become outdated, and outdated documentation can lead to confusion, mistakes, and inefficiency.

To ensure your knowledge base remains a reliable resource, set up a system for regular updates. Regularly review documents, processes, and policies to identify which ones need to be refreshed. Encourage feedback from employees who use the knowledge base regularly; they are often the first to spot outdated or missing information. By staying proactive, you can prevent critical knowledge from slipping through the cracks.

#1: Creating a knowledge maintenance plan

Setting a quarterly, biannually or a custom schedule for reviewing documentation ensures that your knowledge base remains current and effective.

Assign ownership for each document or section of the knowledge base. This responsibility could fall to specific departments, teams, or individuals who are best positioned to keep the information up to date. Prioritize the most critical documents that impact daily operations and employee productivity. 

💡 To keep your knowledge base accurate, track changes with version history and audit trails. 

Real-world solution 

AllyMatter enables automatic version control for every document. How does this work? You can compare versions side-by-side to track all edits and approvals in one place or restore previous versions in a single click. 

#2: Organizing and structuring knowledge for longevity

A well-organized knowledge base is easier to maintain and far more useful to your team. Categorizing and tagging documents effectively is key to intelligent organization and ensuring that users can quickly find the information they need.

Rather than cramming everything into a single document, create concise, easy-to-digest pieces of information that can be expanded on when necessary.

💡 Using clear and logical categories is key to ensuring ease of accessibility and searchability. 

Real-world solution

AllyMatter enables hassle-free structuring within your knowledge base. With smart tags, customizable categories and powerful metadata search, no piece of information is lost or buried under layers of folders. 

#3: Involving teams in the process

The responsibility of maintaining a knowledge base should not fall on a single individual or team. Encouraging input from various departments creates a shared responsibility for its upkeep.

Foster a culture of continuous improvement by making knowledge sharing a key component of your organization's values. Employees will feel ownership over the knowledge they contribute, which increases engagement and ensures that the content is relevant and valuable.

💡 Simplify user management to increase ease of use of collaboration. 

Real-world solution

With AllyMatter, you can manage the entire knowledge base from one dashboard. Everything takes minimal effort, from adding users and assigning roles to secure commenting and access control. 

#4: Ensuring robust security and access control

As your knowledge base becomes more valuable with sensitive company data, confidential projects, and personal information being stored, there’s a need to ensure that only authorized individuals can access specific content. 

Define clear permissions for who can view, edit, or share documents with a robust security framework. Regularly review and update security protocols as the organization grows.

💡 Establish a multi-layered security system that includes user authentication, access restrictions, and encrypted storage.

Real-world solution

AllyMatter protects your knowledge base with enterprise-grade security features that offer bank-level encryption and seamless access for authorized users. With industry-leading encryption for all your data, granular access controls, and regular security audits, your sensitive information stays secure 

#5: Managing knowledge across multiple teams and locations

As organizations grow, information may be fragmented across departments, and there could be discrepancies in how different teams document and share knowledge.

Establish standardized documentation guidelines and encourage cross-department collaboration to ensure consistent knowledge sharing. This way, no matter where employees are located or which team they belong to, they can access consistent and accurate information.

💡 Ensure that all teams use the same templates, tags, and categorization methods.

Real-world solution

‍AllyMatter offers customizable templates and powerful search functions to ensure consistency across teams. Whether it’s managing content from different departments or ensuring that the information flows seamlessly, the platform helps centralize your knowledge base and standardize documentation practices across the organization.

‍

Secure your knowledge base with AllyMatter

Maintaining an internal knowledge base is not a one-time task; it's an ever-evolving process that requires consistent effort and attention. With a solid maintenance plan, proper organization, employee involvement, and the right tools, your knowledge base can evolve to meet the changing needs of your organization.

And, awell-maintained knowledge base increases productivity and streamlines decision-making. By treating your knowledge base as a living document that grows and adapts, you ensure it remains a valuable resource for both new and experienced employees. Sign up for the waitlist and be among the first to experience the AllyMatter advantage!

As companies scale, the challenges of managing knowledge grow. Tribal knowledge dissipates, new processes emerge quickly, and finding a scalable knowledge system becomes essential. The challenge isn’t just choosing a tool—it’s building a system that can grow with your company. Too much structure, and you create bottlenecks; too little, and chaos ensues.

Part 1 of this series gave us an overview of companies providing knowledge management solutions. In Part 2, we build on that analysis, expanding the list of tools and solutions we began to explore.

This guide is critical for organizations navigating fast growth, where new processes emerge faster than they can be documented. The issue isn't solely about selecting the right tool—it’s about building a system that evolves alongside your company, minimizing friction.

The core challenge is understanding how different knowledge base architectures handle the dynamic evolution of information—from early-stage, informal documentation to more mature, structured systems. In this section, we'll focus on tools suited for both early implementation and scaling efforts. By evaluating how each platform supports documentation, team collaboration, and information organization, we aim to guide you in selecting a solution that adapts to your growing needs.

Our Analysis Scope

We cast a wide net when surveying knowledge base solutions, including dedicated documentation platforms and broader tools that offer knowledge base functionality. This is part 2 of our four-part series analyzing global knowledge bases. Our core filter was straightforward: does the tool allow teams to create, organize, and share internal documentation?

This inclusive approach covered:

• Standalone knowledge base platforms
• Wiki-style tools
• Documentation features embedded in larger workplace solutions

We included specialized documentation tools as well as broader collaboration platforms, tracking everything from simple document repositories to advanced systems with workflow automation and AI capabilities. This broad perspective provides context about where each tool fits in the wider knowledge management landscape. The resulting analysis covers everything from focused documentation tools like Slab and Outline to more comprehensive platforms like Confluence and ClickUp, which include knowledge base features as part of their broader offerings. Rather than making assumptions about what you need, we lay out what each platform offers so that you can match capabilities to your requirements.

‍Understanding Our Analysis

‍For each platform, we gathered key information across several dimensions to help guide your decisions:

‍Feature Alignment

‍We assess the feature set of each platform to see how closely it matches core knowledge base needs. Some tools focus primarily on documentation, while others bundle knowledge base capabilities into a broader toolkit. Recognizing this helps you avoid paying for unneeded features or ending up with an overly complex solution.

‍Content Quality Support

‍We evaluate how each platform supports content creation and maintenance, including its editing interface, template systems, and tools for keeping documentation up to date. We also examine how well each platform organizes content—an essential factor when your documentation expands beyond basic needs.

‍Pricing Structure

‍We look at base costs, per-user fees, and any significant pricing tier jumps. We pay close attention to how pricing scales and whether features like Single Sign-On (SSO) require premium tiers—often a hidden cost in many solutions.Technical ImplementationWe review:

• Whether the solution is open source
• Available integrations
• Browser extension availability
• AI capabilities
• Design quality and user interface
• Sharing and collaboration features

We also provide general notes on unique features, limitations, and specific use cases where each tool shines or might fall short. Rather than making direct recommendations, we present this information so you can determine which features align with your needs and growth trajectory.

‍Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

‍Here’s part 2 of the list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization.

‍Wiki.js

Wiki.js is a modern, open-source wiki engine powered by Node.js. It offers a visually appealing interface, Git-based version control, and a modular design with extension support. Installation can be done on various hosting platforms, giving teams flexibility in deployment.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Wiki.js is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it operates as a standalone wiki/knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Attractive, modern UI that feels more current than many wiki platforms
• Multiple editors including Markdown, WYSIWYG, and more
• Version control via Git integrations for trackable changes
• Extensible with modules for authentication, search, and other enhancements

Potential Considerations

• Node.js requirement means you need a server environment capable of running Node
• Setup and configuration can be more involved than a pre-hosted solution
• Limited official documentation; you may rely on community support for advanced customizations
• Licensed under the GNU Affero General Public License

Coda

Coda is a flexible document and spreadsheet hybrid that allows teams to create interactive docs, tables, and workflows. While not a traditional knowledge base platform, it can be configured to function as one, thanks to rich text creation, relational tables, and embedded collaboration features.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Coda is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—primarily a multi-purpose doc tool, but can be used as a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Highly flexible structure for building custom documentation setups
• Embedded tables and views for dynamic, database-like functionality
• Real-time collaboration with comments, revision history, and user permissions
• Automation features (Coda Packs) for linking docs to other tools

Potential Considerations

• Complexity: Setting it up as a KB may require more manual structure and design
• Pricing can scale quickly if you need advanced features or many “Doc Makers”. Starts as low as $36 for 1 Doc Maker and a 5 member team paid monthly. Pro and Team plans charge $12 and $36 per month per doc maker. 
• Not specialized for knowledge bases (no dedicated knowledge management workflows out of the box)

Archbee

Archbee is a documentation tool targeting tech teams and startups, offering features like API docs, diagrams, markdown editing, and a knowledge base structure. It supports integrations with GitHub and Slack, and focuses on developer-friendly content such as code blocks and API reference organization.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Archbee is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can serve as a standalone knowledge base solution, especially for technical documentation.

Why You Might Like It

• Developer-centric features (API docs, code blocks, diagrams)
• Clean interface with Markdown editing and drag-and-drop organization
• Real-time collaboration for simultaneous editing and feedback
• Integrations with Slack, GitHub, and other developer tools

Potential Considerations

• Targeted at technical teams—may be overkill if you only need simple text docs
• Pricing escalates with additional collaborators and advanced features. Starts at $50 per month for the “Growing” plan and $200 per month for “Scaling Plan”. Additional team members beyond the initial included 3 users is between $4 and $10 per team member per month.
• Less focus on traditional “wiki” use cases or non-technical document structures

Bloomfire

Bloomfire is a knowledge sharing and engagement platform designed to help teams easily upload, categorize, and share content. Its focus on social features (likes, comments, Q&A) aims to foster collaboration and continuous learning within organizations.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Bloomfire is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Bloomfire functions as a dedicated knowledge management platform.

Why You Might Like It

• Social learning features (Q&A, likes, comments) encourage team interaction
• Powerful search with automatic transcription for video content
• Analytics to track engagement and identify top contributors or content gaps
• Flexible content types (documents, videos, images) for diverse knowledge sharing

Potential Considerations

• Pricing may be higher than simpler KB-only tools. Pricing not publicly available.
• Primarily cloud-based, so no self-hosted option
• Focus on social features might be unnecessary if you only need basic documentation

KnowledgeOwl

KnowledgeOwl is a standalone knowledge base solution offering a user-friendly editor, customizable themes, and article organization via categories and subcategories. It’s designed to help companies publish internal or external documentation, FAQs, and user guides with minimal technical overhead. Has high touch service and provides migration services to move you from your existing documentation to KnowledgeOwl. 

Key Information

• Open Source? No, KnowledgeOwl is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s a dedicated knowledge base platform.

Why You Might Like It

• Easy setup and straightforward interface for quick adoption
• Customization of KB layout, branding, and domains
• Built-in analytics to see which topics users search for the most
• Templates and versioning to streamline creating and updating articles

Potential Considerations

• Limited integrations compared to larger or more established platforms
• Pricing can get high with add-ons or extra seat requirements. Starts at $100 per month for their all inclusive knowledge base tool with all features included. Charges an additional $25 per extra author. 
• Less suitable if you need project management or extensive collaboration features

ProProfs Knowledge Base

ProProfs Knowledge Base is a solution aimed at both internal team documentation and external help centers. It provides a simple, WYSIWYG editor, multiple templates, and options for customization. It also integrates with other ProProfs products, like their help desk and survey tools.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, ProProfs Knowledge Base is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can function independently as a knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Beginner-friendly editor and article templates
• Multilingual support for global teams or customer bases
• Analytics dashboard to track article performance and user feedback
• Integration with ProProfs Help Desk, Quiz Maker, and Chat for a broader solution

Potential Considerations

• Pricing depends on users and advanced features. Free for 1 author and 25 pages, Business plan starts at $79 per author per month. Custom domain and removing ProProfs branding requires an additional $30 per month.
• Less robust for technical teams needing version control or code-specific documentation
• Limited advanced workflow or project management capabilities

Zoho Desk (Knowledge Base Module)

Zoho Desk is a customer service platform that includes a Knowledge Base Module for creating and managing help articles. While it’s aimed at external support, it can be adapted for internal documentation. It integrates with other Zoho products, offering a seamless experience for existing Zoho users.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Zoho Desk is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—part of Zoho Desk, but can function as a KB within that suite.

Why You Might Like It

• Built-in workflows for creating, reviewing, and publishing articles
• AI tools (“Zia”) that suggest relevant articles to agents and users
• Integration with the larger Zoho ecosystem (CRM, Projects, etc.)
• Multi-brand portals if you run multiple products or services

Potential Considerations

• Primarily customer-focused, so purely internal KB features may be limited
• Costs can rise if you add more Zoho apps or premium features. Between $7 and $40 per user per month.
• Less flexible than a dedicated or open-source KB if you need specific customizations

‍Papyrs

Papyrs is a drag-and-drop intranet and knowledge base platform aimed at small to midsize businesses. It offers page-building tools, form creation, and a user-friendly interface to quickly create internal wikis or documentation portals.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Papyrs is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Papyrs can serve as a standalone intranet/knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Drag-and-drop page building with widgets for text, images, forms, etc.
• Simple permission controls to manage who sees or edits certain pages
• Built-in search for quick content discovery
• Minimal learning curve thanks to intuitive design

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced integrations beyond common tools (e.g., Slack, Google Workspace)
• Less suitable for large enterprises with complex documentation hierarchies
• Pricing can grow if you need more users or extra storage. Ranges from $99 to $999 per month depending on the plan chosen when paid monthly.

Stack Overflow for Teams

Stack Overflow for Teams adapts the popular Q&A format for internal organizational use. It focuses on capturing and retaining knowledge through questions and answers, with tagging and search functionality that helps employees find solutions quickly.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Stack Overflow for Teams is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though it centers on Q&A rather than traditional article-based documentation.

Why You Might Like It

• Familiar Q&A format for tech-savvy teams
• Powerful search and tagging to quickly surface relevant answers
• Gamification (reputation points, badges) can encourage participation
• Integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Jira

Potential Considerations

• Less traditional knowledge base structure—focused on Q&A rather than articles
• Pricing scales with the number of active users or advanced features (SSO, analytics). Free plan available. Paid plans start at $7.70 per user per month and higher. Enterprise plans available. 
• Might require cultural buy-in to keep questions and answers organized

Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft SharePoint is a comprehensive platform often used for intranets, document management, and collaboration. While it’s not a traditional knowledge base tool, teams commonly use SharePoint sites and document libraries to organize and share internal documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, SharePoint is a Microsoft product and not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—part of Microsoft 365 ecosystem, but can be set up as a KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Deep integration with Microsoft 365 (Office apps, Teams, OneDrive)
• Flexible site creation with custom web parts for document libraries, lists, etc.
• Robust security and permissions for enterprise-grade access control
• Scalable for large organizations with complex needs

Potential Considerations

• Complex setup if you’re unfamiliar with SharePoint administration
• UI can be less intuitive for non-technical users
• Cost can grow quickly for certain licensing tiers or advanced features

eXo Platform

eXo Platform is an open-source digital workplace solution that includes intranet, collaboration, and knowledge management features. It offers document sharing, wikis, forums, and a social layer to help employees engage with content and each other.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, eXo Platform offers an open-source version. This is however complex between eXo Platform CE (community edition) and Enterprise Edition. 
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—it's a broader digital workplace product, but includes a wiki/KB component.

Why You Might Like It

• All-in-one collaboration (intranet, wiki, chat, tasks) in one platform
• Social features like activity streams and user profiles
• Customizable with extensions and themes
• Self-hosted or cloud options give flexibility

Potential Considerations

• Complex deployment if you want to self-host and customize extensively
• Might be more than needed if you only want a simple documentation tool
• Support for open-source version can be community-driven, potentially slower
• Pricing is between $3 per user per month and $5 or more

Basecamp

Basecamp is known primarily as a project management and team communication tool, but it includes an internal “Docs & Files” feature. While not a dedicated KB solution, it can be repurposed to store and organize important team knowledge.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Basecamp is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it's a project management suite, though docs can serve as a lightweight KB.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified platform for tasks, chat, and basic documentation
• Simple file and doc organization to keep resources in one place
• Easy onboarding with a user-friendly, minimalistic interface
• Notifications keep everyone updated on new or edited docs

Potential Considerations

• Limited doc features (no advanced formatting, version control, or deep structure)
• Pricing is project-oriented and might be too high if you only need KB functionality. Starts at $15 per user per month, or better $299 per month ($349 paid monthly) for the entire organization without any limits on users. Free for one project though.
• Less robust for large documentation sets or complex knowledge hierarchies

KMS Lighthouse

KMS Lighthouse is a knowledge management solution tailored for contact centers and customer service teams. It delivers fast access to verified information through a structured, centralized knowledge base, with features like decision trees and real-time updates.
‍

Key Information

• Open Source? No, KMS Lighthouse is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, although it’s specialized for contact center knowledge.

Why You Might Like It

• Decision trees and guided workflows for consistent customer responses
• Real-time updates to ensure agents always have the latest information
• Analytics to measure agent performance and content usefulness
• Integration with CRM and ticketing systems (Salesforce, Zendesk, etc.)

Potential Considerations

• Industry focus on call centers; less relevant for general or internal documentation
• Pricing is typically enterprise-level, which can be cost-prohibitive for smaller teams
• Limited broad collaboration features beyond the Q&A or agent context

Helprace

Helprace is a help desk and customer service platform that includes a community forum, feedback system, and a knowledge base module. It’s designed for both internal use and public self-service, helping reduce repetitive inquiries by making documentation easily accessible.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Helprace is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—part of a customer service suite, but its KB module can run independently.

Why You Might Like It

• Unified support: tickets, community, and KB all in one platform
• User feedback loops: customers can comment on articles, suggest improvements
• Categories and tagging for organizing articles
• Moderation tools to keep content accurate and appropriate

Potential Considerations

• Less specialized for purely internal documentation if you don’t need a help desk
• Pricing scales with seat count and advanced features
• Limited advanced KB capabilities compared to dedicated documentation platforms

Documentor (WordPress Plugin)

Documentor is a WordPress plugin designed to create documentation or knowledge base sections within a WordPress site. It supports multiple documentation guides, drag-and-drop sorting, and customizable templates for easy user navigation.

Key Information

• Open Source? Partially—WordPress itself is open source, but Documentor may have premium features.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not independently—it runs on WordPress, but can function as a dedicated doc portal within that environment.

Why You Might Like It

• Easy setup if you already have a WordPress site
• Drag-and-drop reordering of articles or sections
• Customizable design using WordPress themes and plugins
• Search for quick article discovery

Potential Considerations

• Requires WordPress hosting and maintenance
• Limited advanced features compared to full KB platforms (e.g., built-in analytics, AI)
• Premium version needed for some advanced functions like password protection

Heroic Knowledge Base (WordPress Plugin)

Heroic Knowledge Base is another WordPress plugin that transforms a WordPress site into a structured knowledge base. It features article attachments, built-in analytics, and a drag-and-drop article reorder system to keep content organized.

Key Information

• Open Source? WordPress is open source, but Heroic KB is a premium plugin.
• Standalone KB Tool? Requires WordPress; not standalone in a traditional sense.

Why You Might Like It

• Seamless WordPress integration with custom shortcodes and widgets
• Article feedback and rating to gauge helpfulness
• Built-in search and analytics for improved user experience and insights
• Easy theming to match your existing WordPress site design

Potential Considerations

• Limited to WordPress—not ideal if you don’t use it already
• Paywall for advanced features or support
• Less robust for enterprise-level knowledge management needs

TallyFox Tallium

TallyFox Tallium is a knowledge management and collaboration platform designed to connect people, content, and data intelligently. It uses a semantic search engine and smart tagging to surface relevant information across teams.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, TallyFox Tallium is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, though it also includes broader collaboration features.

Why You Might Like It

• Semantic search that learns from user interactions to improve results
• Smart tagging for more precise organization and retrieval
• Collaboration features like content sharing, discussion, and notifications
• Knowledge clusters to group related content automatically

Potential Considerations

• More advanced than a simple KB—might be unnecessary complexity for small teams
• Pricing could be high for robust features like AI-driven search
• Implementation may require training or consulting to leverage semantic capabilities

MyHub Intranet

MyHub Intranet is a cloud-based intranet platform providing communication, collaboration, and knowledge sharing tools. It offers a drag-and-drop site builder, file sharing, forums, blogs, and wikis that can function as a central knowledge base for employees.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, MyHub Intranet is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it's a broader intranet solution but includes wiki/KB elements.

Why You Might Like It

• Comprehensive intranet solution with multiple modules (document storage, forums, wikis)
• Quick deployment with pre-built templates for different use cases
• User-friendly admin interface for easy customization and branding
• Collaboration tools help teams share information in one secure location

Potential Considerations

• Could be overkill if you only need a basic knowledge base
• Pricing information is not publicly available
• Less specialized for purely technical or developer-focused documentation

Freedcamp

Freedcamp is a project management platform that includes file organization and Wiki capabilities. While it’s mostly used for task tracking and collaboration, the Wiki module can serve as a lightweight knowledge base for internal documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Freedcamp is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of Freedcamp’s project management environment.

Why You Might Like It

• Integrated Wiki for centralizing project documentation
• Free basic plan for small teams or personal use
• Collaboration tools (tasks, discussions, calendars) all in one place
• Cloud-based with minimal setup required

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced KB features compared to dedicated solutions
• Focus on project/task management may add unnecessary complexity if you only want a KB
• Scaling to larger teams or more storage may require paid plans
• Pricing is as low as $1.49 per user per month and goes up to $19.99. Free plan available.

Quip (Salesforce)

Quip is a team collaboration tool from Salesforce that combines documents, spreadsheets, and chat in a single interface. While it doesn’t market itself strictly as a knowledge base solution, you can use Quip’s shared folders, live docs, and permissions to store and manage team knowledge.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Quip is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely—it’s part of the Salesforce ecosystem, though you can use it independently.

Why You Might Like It

• Real-time collaboration with inline chat and comments
• Spreadsheets embedded into documents for multi-functional content
• Salesforce integration for teams already using Salesforce CRM
• User-friendly interface that’s easy to adopt

Potential Considerations

• Less structured knowledge base approach—more freeform docs
• Costs can add up for larger teams or those needing advanced Salesforce features. Starts at $100 per user per month
• Limited advanced doc management features like version history or hierarchical organization

XWiki

XWiki is an open-source wiki platform designed for building collaborative knowledge base solutions and even custom web applications. It features powerful version control, access rights management, and a modular extension system, making it highly customizable for varied documentation needs.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, XWiki is open source. Uses a GNU General Public License
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can be used entirely as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Extensive customization through plugins and extensions
• Robust permission system for fine-grained access control
• Version history and rollback built into each page
• Active open-source community for support and frequent updates

Potential Considerations

• Requires hosting and setup, which can be technical for non-IT teams
• More complex than simpler wiki solutions if you just need a basic KB
• Customization may demand time and technical know-how

Interested to know more? Check out part 3 of this series.

‍Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, you might opt for a focused platform. If you require broader project management or collaboration features, a more comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can grow with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

Knowledge bases fail more often due to poor implementation than poor tooling. Having worked on knowledge management systems across dozens of growing companies, we’ve observed that success depends on striking the right balance between structure and flexibility during periods of rapid change.

This is particularly critical for organizations experiencing rapid growth, where tribal knowledge leaves as people depart and new processes emerge faster than they can be documented. The challenge isn’t just choosing a tool—it’s building a system that can evolve alongside your company without creating friction. Teams often struggle with systems that start off well but become bottlenecks when they’re too rigid, or devolve into information chaos when they’re too loose.

The key is understanding how various knowledge base architectures manage the natural evolution of a company’s information—from early, informal documentation to mature, structured processes. In this exploration of knowledge base tools, we’ll look at solutions suited for early-stage implementation and for rapid scaling. By comparing how each platform handles documentation, team collaboration, and information organization, we’ll help you choose a system that not only meets your current needs but also adapts to your company’s growth.

Note

The prices and costs mentioned here are true to the date of publishing - 6th Feb 2025. Please reach out to hello [at] allymatter [dot] com if you think we've made an error or if you think this post needs a correction

Our Analysis Scope

We cast a wide net when surveying knowledge base solutions, including dedicated documentation platforms and broader tools that offer knowledge base functionality. This article is part 1 of our four-part series analyzing global knowledge bases. Our core filter was straightforward: does the tool allow teams to create, organize, and share internal documentation?

This inclusive approach covered:

• Standalone knowledge base platforms
• Wiki-style tools
• Documentation features embedded in larger workplace solutions

We included specialized documentation tools as well as broader collaboration platforms, tracking everything from simple document repositories to advanced systems with workflow automation and AI capabilities. This broad perspective provides context about where each tool fits in the wider knowledge management landscape. The resulting analysis covers everything from focused documentation tools like Slab and Outline to more comprehensive platforms like Confluence and ClickUp, which include knowledge base features as part of their broader offerings. Rather than making assumptions about what you need, we lay out what each platform offers so that you can match capabilities to your requirements.

Understanding Our Analysis

For each platform, we gathered key information across several dimensions to help guide your decisions:

Feature Alignment

We assess the feature set of each platform to see how closely it matches core knowledge base needs. Some tools focus primarily on documentation, while others bundle knowledge base capabilities into a broader toolkit. Recognizing this helps you avoid paying for unneeded features or ending up with an overly complex solution.

Content Quality Support

We evaluate how each platform supports content creation and maintenance, including its editing interface, template systems, and tools for keeping documentation up to date. We also examine how well each platform organizes content—an essential factor when your documentation expands beyond basic needs.

Pricing Structure

We look at base costs, per-user fees, and any significant pricing tier jumps. We pay close attention to how pricing scales and whether features like Single Sign-On (SSO) require premium tiers—often a hidden cost in many solutions.

Technical Implementation

We review:

• Whether the solution is open source
• Available integrations
• Browser extension availability
• AI capabilities
• Design quality and user interface
• Sharing and collaboration features

We also provide general notes on unique features, limitations, and specific use cases where each tool shines or might fall short. Rather than making direct recommendations, we present this information so you can determine which features align with your needs and growth trajectory.

Knowledge Base Tools – Global List

Here’s part 1 of the list of tools that can serve as the backbone of a knowledge base in your organization.

Atlassian Confluence

Confluence by Atlassian is a collaborative workspace that can function as a standalone knowledge base, helping teams create, share, and organize knowledge efficiently. It features dynamic pages, whiteboards, databases, and AI tools for automating tasks and summarizing documents. Confluence integrates smoothly with other Atlassian products (like Jira) and many third-party tools, offering a robust library of templates for diverse team needs.

Key Information

• Open Source: No, Confluence is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool: Yes, it can serve as a standalone knowledge base, though it also includes broader project collaboration features.

Why You Might Like It

• Centralized knowledge repository
• Suitable for multiple teams (marketing, project planning, software development, etc.)
• Robust security with user-level permissions
• Rich integration ecosystem with Atlassian suite and other tools. You will like this if you are already using Atlassian’s other tools like Jira and have large dev and product teams who are already working on Jira. 

Potential Considerations

• Complexity: Might be overkill for very small teams or simple documentation needs. 
• Pricing Tiers: Free tier for up to 10 users, then $5.16, $9.73 per user. Enterprise plan available. 

Slab

Slab is a dedicated knowledge base platform that emphasizes a clean, intuitive interface for team documentation. It offers powerful editing tools, version history, and an advanced search function—making it easy to create, update, and find information. Slab integrates with popular apps (e.g., Slack, GitHub) to keep your documentation workflow streamlined. It is built for both technical and non-technical teams and their needs. 

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Slab is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Slab can be used entirely as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Minimal, user-friendly interface that lowers adoption barriers
• Powerful search to quickly locate relevant content
• Version history for transparent tracking of content edits
• Integrations with popular tools (e.g., Slack, GitHub), centralizing knowledge.

Potential Considerations

• Pricing can scale up depending on team size and feature needs. Free for up to 10 users. $6.67, $12.50 and Enterprise pricing for organizations with more than 10 users.  
• Advanced administrative features (such as SSO) may require higher-tier plans

Outline

Outline is an open-source knowledge base tool designed for collaborative team documentation. It offers a clean, intuitive interface, hierarchical content organization, and robust search capabilities, making it easy to create, share, and maintain information. With built-in integrations (e.g., Slack, Zapier) and a focus on simplicity, Outline can serve as a seamless hub for storing and accessing your team’s knowledge.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Outline is open source. It uses a Business Source License 1.1.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Outline can function as a fully standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Hierarchical organization for structuring documentation into nested collections
• Powerful search to quickly locate relevant pages
• Clean, user-friendly interface that requires minimal onboarding
• Slack and Zapier integrations for streamlined workflows

Potential Considerations

• Self-hosting requires your own server resources and technical setup if you opt for on-premise
• License - $10 per month for up to 10 users, $79 for 11 to 100 users, $249 for 101-200 users on the Cloud. Self-managed instances are free for an unknown number of users, Business and Enterprise editions are $4 and $5 per user per month. 
• Limited advanced features compared to more comprehensive project management or collaboration platforms
• Community-driven support model, which may affect response times for troubleshooting.

Notion

Notion is a versatile collaboration platform that combines documents, databases, and wikis in one place. Its flexibility allows teams to build a fully customized knowledge base with pages and subpages, while also supporting task management and other workflow needs. Users can embed various media types, create relational databases, and organize content in a highly visual, drag-and-drop interface. Requires third-party plugins for approval workflows, compliance and many other essential features which are needed for many organizations.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Notion is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—it’s a multipurpose platform, but it can effectively serve as a knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Flexible page structure: Easily create and rearrange pages, subpages, and databases
• Rich content embedding: Insert images, videos, code snippets, and more
• Powerful templates: Pre-built layouts and customizable templates help standardize documentation
• Collaboration features: Real-time editing, comments, and @mentions for quick feedback

Potential Considerations

• Broad feature set: Might be more complex than necessary if you only want a simple knowledge base
• Pricing tiers: Free for personal use, $10 and $15 per seat per month for Plus and Business plans. Enterprise plans on request. Advanced permissions and admin controls may require higher-tier plans
• Learning curve: Navigating databases, relations, and templates can be challenging for first-time users

Slite

Slite is a collaborative documentation platform with a Slack-inspired interface, making it particularly user-friendly for teams already familiar with chat-based tools. It offers real-time editing, threaded comments, and simple content organization through channels and folders. Slite focuses on ease of use, helping teams rapidly create and share knowledge without steep learning curves.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Slite is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Slite can function as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Simple organization: Channels, folders, and tags help keep documentation tidy
• Integrations: Connects with tools like Slack and GitHub to streamline workflows
• Desktop App: Use the desktop app for easy access to all documents on your desktop

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced features: May not offer the same feature depth as broader project management suites
• Pricing - $8 and $10 for Standard and Premium plans, Enterprise plans available. Scales based on team size and feature requirements
• Fewer built-in automation capabilities compared to larger, more established platforms

Guru

Guru is a knowledge management platform designed to provide real-time information to teams through a browser extension, Slack integration, and other communication tools. It uses “Cards” for quick access to bite-sized knowledge and includes verification workflows to ensure information stays accurate and up to date. It provides a verifier system which helps users understand the accuracy of information in the knowledge base.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Guru is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Guru can be used solely as a knowledge base solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Real-time accessibility: Browser extension and Slack integration allow quick retrieval of information
• Verification workflow: Ensures content remains accurate through regular checks and approvals
• Card-based format: Breaks down information into smaller, easily digestible pieces
• Contextual insights: Automatically surfaces relevant knowledge within your workflow

Potential Considerations

• Pricing may increase based on team size or advanced feature needs. Starts at $18 per user per month. Enterprise plans available. 
• Limited long-form documentation features compared to more document-centric platforms
• Learning curve for teams unfamiliar with card-based content organization

Nuclino

Nuclino is a lightweight, real-time collaboration tool designed to help teams build and maintain knowledge bases and wikis. Its intuitive interface uses a card-based, visual workspace where you can create and link pages (or “items”) to organize information. Nuclino also supports real-time editing and commenting, making it easy for teams to collaboratively update and refine documentation.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Nuclino is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Nuclino can serve as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Simple, visual organization: Create interlinked pages and visually map out relationships
• Real-time collaboration: Edit simultaneously and leave in-line comments for quick feedback
• Minimalistic interface: Easy for new users to adopt without a steep learning curve
• Search and linking: Quickly locate content and cross-reference related pages

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced features: May not offer the depth of larger, more comprehensive platforms
• Pricing tiers: Basic version is free, $6 and $10 for Starter and Business plans
• Lacks extensive integrations compared to some other knowledge management tools

Tettra

Tettra is a knowledge management platform that integrates tightly with Slack and Microsoft Teams, focusing on a Q&A-driven approach to sharing and organizing information. It allows teams to create and maintain internal documentation in a user-friendly environment, with a strong emphasis on capturing and surfacing knowledge in real time.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Tettra is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Tettra can be used as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Q&A-driven workflow: Encourages users to ask questions and get quick, documented responses
• Slack/MS Teams integration: Allows easy knowledge sharing within familiar communication tools
• Simple content structure: Provides straightforward templates and categories for organizing documentation
• Verification reminders: Helps keep documentation accurate and up to date

Potential Considerations

• Limited advanced features: Focuses on Q&A and basic documentation, which may not meet complex needs
• Pricing: $5 per user per month for Basic with a minimum of 10 users, $10 per user per month for Scaling with a minimum of 10 users, $7200 per year for Professional with 50 users included. 
• Narrower integration ecosystem: Strong focus on Slack and Teams, but fewer other native integrations

Zendesk Guide

Zendesk Guide is the knowledge base component of the larger Zendesk Suite, designed to help businesses create, organize, and deliver customer-facing or internal documentation. It offers customizable themes, AI-powered answer suggestions, and a self-service portal to quickly surface relevant content. Although it’s best known for customer support, it can also function as an internal knowledge repository. Not really designed or built for internal teams’ usage. It is built to let internal teams serve external customers. Help desk features dominate the knowledge base platform. 

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Zendesk Guide is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—it’s part of Zendesk, but can be used primarily as a knowledge base solution within the suite.

Why You Might Like It

• Easy self-service: Enables customers or team members to quickly find answers on their own
• AI-powered suggestions: Suggests relevant articles based on inquiries or ticket context
• Customizable design: Offers theming options to match branding or internal style preferences
• Robust analytics: Tracks search queries, article views, and engagement for continuous improvement

Potential Considerations

• Focus on customer support: May have more features than needed if you only want internal documentation
• Pricing: Part of the broader Zendesk ecosystem, which might be costlier for smaller teams. Starts at $25 per agent per month, and goes up to $149 per agent per month. Enterprise plans available. 
• Integration limits: Works best alongside Zendesk products; third-party integrations may be more limited

Document360

Document360 is a dedicated knowledge base software that allows you to create, manage, and publish documentation for both internal teams and external customers. It features a markdown-based editor, category-based organization, and robust versioning capabilities. It also offers advanced analytics and customizable branding options, making it suitable for businesses looking for a professional, standalone KB solution.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Document360 is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Document360 is specifically designed as a standalone knowledge base.

Why You Might Like It

• Markdown-based editor for quick and easy content creation
• Category and subcategory structure for organized documentation
• Versioning and rollback to track and revert to previous document states
• Custom branding and domain support to keep your KB on-brand and professional-looking
• Analytics and reporting to monitor article performance and user engagement

Potential Considerations

• Pricing is not public but may be higher than generic documentation tools, especially for larger teams
• Limited broader collaboration features, as it focuses on KB functionality rather than project management
• Learning curve for those unfamiliar with markdown-based editing

Helpjuice

Helpjuice is a standalone knowledge base platform aimed at helping businesses create and organize their documentation for both internal teams and external customers. It offers customizable templates, a powerful search function, and detailed analytics to help understand how users engage with content. With a focus on ease of setup and usability, Helpjuice can be quickly deployed to support self-service support and internal knowledge sharing.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Helpjuice is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, Helpjuice operates primarily as a standalone knowledge base solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Customizable templates to match branding and design preferences
• Powerful search functionality to help users quickly find the right content
• Analytics and reporting that reveal gaps in documentation and measure performance
• Easy setup allows teams to get started without lengthy onboarding

Potential Considerations

• Pricing starts at $120 per month for 4 users, $200 for 16 users, $289 for 60 users and $659 for unlimited users. 
• Feature depth is focused on KB functionality, so broader collaboration or project management features are limited
• Integration options may not be as extensive as some larger, multi-tool platforms

Freshdesk Knowledge Base

Freshdesk Knowledge Base is part of Freshdesk’s customer support suite, enabling teams to create and manage public or private documentation. It offers a simple editor, SEO settings for public content, and a portal for end users to search articles.Built for serving external users first. Might not be a good fit for internal documentation needs, especially for HR, Operations and Finance teams, or for writing internal SOPs.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, it is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—part of the Freshdesk suite, though it can function independently as a knowledge base module.

Why You Might Like It

• Integrated with Freshdesk Support for ticket deflection and unified customer support
• SEO-friendly features for public knowledge bases
• Analytics to monitor popular articles and identify content gaps
• Multiple language support for global audiences

Potential Considerations

• Costs - Free for up to 2 agents, $15 and $49 per agent per month for Growth and Pro plans. Enterprise plans available. Will increase if you need to add additional FreshWorks tools.
• Focus on customer-facing documentation rather than purely internal KB needs
• Limited advanced collaboration features compared to all-in-one documentation tools

Crisp Helpdesk Knowledge Base

Crisp is a customer messaging platform that also includes a Helpdesk Knowledge Base feature. It lets you publish help articles for customers, embed media, and customize the look and feel of your help center. Articles can be linked to Crisp’s live chat for context-based support.

Key Information

• Open Source? No, Crisp is not open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Not purely standalone—it’s part of Crisp’s broader customer communication suite, though you can use only the Knowledge Base function if desired.

Why You Might Like It

• Live chat integration for context-driven article suggestions
• Simple article editor for quick content creation
• Customizable design to match your brand
• Multilingual support for customer-facing content

Potential Considerations

• Feature set is primarily oriented toward external (customer) help centers
• Pricing can escalate when combining multiple Crisp features (chat, campaigns, knowledge base)
• Less suitable for purely internal documentation if you need deeper collaboration or versioning

BookStack

BookStack is an open-source platform designed specifically for creating and organizing documentation in a book-like structure. It uses a hierarchical system of “Books,” “Chapters,” and “Pages,” making it easy to navigate and maintain.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, BookStack is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s designed as a standalone knowledge base/documentation tool.

Why You Might Like It

• Simple, intuitive hierarchy (Books → Chapters → Pages) for clarity
• Self-hosting gives you full control and data ownership
• WYSIWYG editor or Markdown support for flexible content creation
• Active community providing updates and support

Potential Considerations

• Requires hosting and maintenance for self-hosted setup. No cloud options available.
• Limited built-in integrations compared to commercial, cloud-based options
• Fewer advanced features (e.g., AI or advanced analytics) out of the box
• License - Available with an MIT License

DokuWiki

DokuWiki is a lightweight, open-source wiki platform that stores data in plain text. It’s popular for its simplicity, ease of maintenance, and ability to run on basic hosting packages. DokuWiki supports version control on pages without the need for databases. There are hosting providers who provide you the ability to host it on the cloud. Requires handholding though. 

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, DokuWiki is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it functions independently as a knowledge base/wiki tool.

Why You Might Like It

• No database required—runs on plain text files
• Easy to install and maintain with minimal technical overhead
• Strong plugin ecosystem to extend functionality
• ACL (Access Control Lists) for granular user permissions

Potential Considerations

• UI design can be more basic and less modern than commercial solutions
• Setup might require technical know-how for customization or plugin management
• Limited built-in collaboration features (e.g., real-time editing) without extensions
• License - Available under the GNU General Public License

MediaWiki

MediaWiki is the open-source software powering Wikipedia, known for handling large-scale, collaborative documentation. It’s highly configurable but can require significant setup for features like themes, advanced permissions, and extensions.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, MediaWiki is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it’s a robust, standalone wiki solution.

Why You Might Like It

• Extremely scalable—proven to handle massive amounts of content
• Active community and plugin ecosystem for customizing functionality
• Version history and robust revision control built-in
• Ideal for large, collaborative projects needing wiki-style editing

Potential Considerations

• Complex setup: Configuration can be time-consuming, especially for non-technical users
• UI is wiki-focused and might feel outdated or less intuitive for some teams
• Requires plugins for features like WYSIWYG editing, advanced permissions, or SSO
• License - Available under the GNU General Public License

GitBook

GitBook started as a tool for publishing Git-based documentation but has evolved into a polished platform for writing and hosting content. It provides a clean, modern interface for docs, supports live previews, and can integrate with GitHub for version control.

Key Information

• Open Source? The original GitBook CLI was open source, but the hosted GitBook service is not fully open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can serve as a standalone documentation/knowledge base solution.

Why You Might Like It

• GitHub integration for version control and collaborative writing
• Modern design with a clean, minimal interface
• Live previews and Markdown-based editing
• Custom domains and branding for professional presentation

Potential Considerations

• Free vs. paid: Offers a free plan. Paid plans start at $65 and $249 per site per month. Adding additional collaborators starts at $12 per collaborator per month.
• Less “wiki-like” collaboration model—more aligned with docs or developer-oriented content
• Advanced features (e.g., SSO, advanced roles) may be locked behind premium tiers

Docsify

Docsify is an open-source solution for quickly generating single-page documentation sites from Markdown files. Geared primarily toward developers, it runs client-side, making it easy to host on services like GitHub Pages.

Key Information

• Open Source? Yes, Docsify is open source.
• Standalone KB Tool? Yes, it can function as a lightweight knowledge base solution if you prefer Markdown and static hosting.

Why You Might Like It

• No build process required—content is rendered on the fly from Markdown
• Extremely lightweight and easy to host anywhere
• Plugin ecosystem for expanding functionality (search, sidebar, etc.)
• Ideal for developer-focused documentation or quick static sites

Potential Considerations

• Limited feature set compared to full-fledged KB platforms (no built-in user management, analytics, etc.)
• Manual configuration can be required for theming, navigation, or advanced features
• Not suited for non-technical users who want a turnkey solution
• Available under a MIT License

Interested to know more? Check out part 2 of this series.

Next Steps

1. Identify Your Core Needs
   Before diving into any platform, map out your organization’s most pressing documentation needs. Consider growth projections, department-specific requirements, and any compliance or security concerns.
2. Evaluate Feature Sets
   Compare your needs against the capabilities of each tool. If simple documentation is your primary goal, you might opt for a focused platform. If you require broader project management or collaboration features, a more comprehensive suite like Confluence may be a better fit.
3. Plan for Scale
   Avoid selecting a tool that meets today’s needs but will be cumbersome or too small-scale in a year. Look for flexible pricing models and feature sets that can grow with your company.
4. Develop Clear Governance
   No matter which tool you pick, implement guidelines for content creation, review, and updates. A strong governance structure ensures your knowledge base remains current and avoids sprawling into chaos.

By choosing a knowledge base solution that balances structure with flexibility—and by planning for both immediate and future growth—you’ll set up a system that can evolve alongside your organization. As you continue exploring the platforms featured in this global guide, keep your unique workflows and culture in mind. A well-implemented knowledge base does more than store information; it becomes a living resource that supports and scales with your company’s success.

An internal knowledge base acts as a centralized, cloud-based repository of information that allows employees and stakeholders to seamlessly access essential resources. As the single source of truth, it reduces time employees spend searching for answers—time that 54% of U.S. professionals admit to losing, often more than handling important emails.

In sharp contrast to the ‘information deficit’ observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses today have access to a treasure trove of information that’s crucial to strategic decision-making and workplace efficiency. The challenge, however, lies in managing and ensuring easy and secure company-wide access to this data. 

An internal knowledge base software provides a robust platform to store, categorize and implement your knowledge base. Be it human resources or software engineering, every department in your company stands to gain from an internal KB.

Advantages of having a well-structured internal knowledge base 

Quicker onboarding and training

Even more time-consuming than hiring employees is training them for their roles and responsibilities. Studies show that it can take up to six months or more for a company to break even on its investment in a new hire, as they gradually get up to speed in the job. 

An internal KB optimizes training and onboarding programs by bringing scattered learning and development modules into one database and improving new employee retention by nearly 82%.  

Process standardization

Research shows that organizations that endeavor to standardize their business processes avoid redundancies, reduce costs and re-deploy the time saved into other value-adding efforts. It also helps remote teams better coordinate activities as per standards across internal task handover points. 

Standards are uniform processes, established and approved by consensus, for consistently achieving the optimum degree of order. An internal knowledge base ensures that these best practices and documents do not get lost in a sea of information. 

Explore how an internal knowledge base streamlines operations and drives efficiency in remote teams here.

Employee productivity

Inefficient workflows are one of the leading causes of employee downtime. An internal knowledge base streamlines procedures, reduces time spent searching for SOPs and drives productivity. 

In addition, the ability to quickly look up required information also contributes to improving the efficiency of employees. A company with a strong culture of documentation fosters better communication, collaboration and satisfaction among its team members. 

Effortless collaboration

Information silos and stunted innovation often go hand-in-hand. No matter the size of your company, effective communication and collaboration are key to growth. A robust, easy-to-access internal knowledge base eliminates these barriers and sets the foundation for organizational agility and long-term success.

Whether it's sales or product development teams, a single source of truth empowers employees to solve problems independently, enabling quicker, more agile responses to market shifts. 

What information belongs in your internal knowledge base? 

Internal knowledge bases house a wide range of key data and resources across departments such as: 

Human resources

• Employee handbooks
• Onboarding materials (e.g., checklists, orientation presentations)
• Employee policies (e.g., leave, attendance, code of conduct)
• Compensation and benefits documentation
• Job descriptions and role expectations
• Employee performance review templates
• Training materials and employee development programs
• HR compliance regulations (labor laws, safety guidelines)
• Recruitment and interview guidelines
• Employee wellness and support programs
• Diversity, equity, and inclusion resources
• Employee contact lists and organizational charts
• Exit interview feedback and procedures
• Conflict resolution and grievance procedures
• Health and safety policies

Marketing & sales

• Marketing collateral (brochures, flyers, product sheets)
• Brand guidelines and style guides
• Sales scripts and templates
• Buyer personas and customer journey maps
• Case studies and testimonials
• Marketing campaigns and performance metrics
• Competitor research and analysis
• Lead generation strategies and tactics
• Content calendars and blog post plans
• Sales training materials
• Product demos and video resources
• Pricing guides and discount structures
• Email templates for outreach and follow-ups
• Market research reports and insights
• Social media strategies and content

Support teams

• Knowledge base articles (FAQs, troubleshooting guides)
• Customer support scripts and templates
• Product manuals and user guides
• Service level agreements (SLAs)
• Common customer issues and resolutions
• Helpdesk ticketing systems and procedures
• Troubleshooting checklists and diagnostics
• Contact lists of key team members for escalation
• Product release notes and updates
• Support team training materials
• Customer feedback and surveys
• Product and service knowledge updates
• Incident response and escalation protocols
• Refund, warranty, and return policies

Operations

• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
• Workflow diagrams and process maps
• Inventory management and logistics guidelines
• Vendor management documentation
• Supply chain procedures and guidelines
• Operational efficiency reports and analytics
• Compliance documentation (e.g., health and safety regulations)
• Incident response protocols and emergency procedures
• Resource allocation and scheduling documents
• Risk management strategies and frameworks
• Operational performance metrics (KPIs, benchmarks)
• Maintenance and repair logs (for equipment and facilities)
• Employee shift schedules and task assignments
• Change management documentation
• Operational budgets and forecasting

Legal

• Company contracts and agreements (client, vendor, employee)
• Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
• Corporate governance documents (e.g., board meeting minutes, resolutions)
• Intellectual property documentation (patents, trademarks, copyrights)
• Compliance documentation (industry regulations, laws)
• Privacy policies and terms of service
• Legal templates (e.g., letters, forms, contracts)
• Litigation documents and case summaries
• Employee legal policies (e.g., harassment, discrimination)
• Legal precedents and research
• Risk management and liability forms
• Data protection and security guidelines
• Regulatory filings and reports
• Legal opinions and memos

Finance & accounting

• Financial statements (balance sheets, income statements)
• Budgeting and forecasting documents
• Accounting policies and procedures
• Payroll and compensation guidelines
• Tax filings and documentation
• Accounts payable and receivable records
• Expense tracking and reporting templates
• Financial forecasting reports
• Audit trails and financial audits
• Banking and loan agreements
• Investment portfolios and reports
• Profit and loss analysis
• Capital budgeting and funding strategies
• Cost management and reduction strategies
• Debt and credit management procedures

Product development teams

• Product roadmaps and timelines
• Product specifications and requirements
• Feature request logs and prioritization
• User stories and acceptance criteria
• Product release notes and changelogs
• Wireframes and prototypes
• Customer feedback and surveys
• Market research and competitor analysis
• Product vision and mission statements
• Product performance metrics (e.g., user adoption, NPS)
• User personas and use cases
• Cross-functional collaboration notes (with marketing, sales, support)
• Testing and quality assurance documentation
• Beta testing reports and feedback
• Product training materials

Software engineering teams

• Technical documentation (APIs, architecture diagrams)
• Code repositories and version control guidelines
• Development workflows and best practices
• Technical specs and user stories
• System design and architecture documents
• Bug and issue tracking reports
• Deployment guides and checklists
• Build and release notes
• Testing protocols and procedures (unit, integration, user testing)
• Security and compliance documentation
• Incident management and troubleshooting guides
• Change management logs
• Integration and third-party software documentation
• Developer onboarding materials
• Sprint and release planning documents
• System performance reports and monitoring dashboards

Senior management

• Strategic plans and objectives
• Organizational charts and reporting structures
• Budgeting and financial reports
• Company policies and procedures
• Meeting notes and action items
• Project management documentation (e.g., timelines, roadmaps)
• Departmental goals and KPIs
• Risk management frameworks
• Business continuity and crisis management plans
• Leadership development resources
• Performance metrics and reviews
• Executive communications and announcements
• Cross-functional collaboration guidelines
• Change management plans
• Vendor and partnership agreements

In case of sensitive data that needs to remain confidential, internal knowledge base softwares provide role-based access, ensuring only authorized individuals can view restricted content. On the other hand, external knowledge bases are public-facing platforms where customers and potential clients can access important information about your company’s products and services. These often include help articles, FAQs, how-to guides, and user manuals.

How to choose the right internal knowledge base software for your business? 

An internal knowledge base software enhances organizational efficiency by helping teams overcome information overload and streamline inconsistent procedures. Here’s a 3-step guide to picking the right internal KB for your business: 

Step 1: Evaluate your current situation

Determine whether you need an internal knowledge base software by auditing your current workflows. Here are a few questions that help draw a clear picture of your current knowledge management processes: 

How is your organization’s knowledge being currently managed? ‍

• ‍Do you have documentation that’s dispersed across different repositories such as shared drives, emails, physical folders and more?  

How do your employees access this information? 

• ‍Is the data easily accessible or do employees have to look into multiple locations to find something? 
• If so, is there a system that lets employees know where to find what they need? 

Does your organization have a culture of knowledge documentation? How much of it is documented so far? 

• ‍How many documents are your employees working with? Is it tens, hundreds or thousands of documents? 
• Is any of the knowledge not documented? Does any of it reside only in the minds of a few employees?  ‍

Who can access your knowledge? 

• Do all departments have access to knowledge?
• Is sensitive information protected from unauthorized employees?

How often is your knowledge base updated? ‍

• Do your employees find the data relevant and useful?
• Do you have checks in place to ensure its accuracy and effectiveness?
• How often do you review the knowledge for updates? 
• Do you have a clear editorial process? 
• How are you alerting employees of critical information updates? Via email?

Step 2: Create a list of requirements based on your goals 

Clearly defining the outcomes you want to achieve with an internal knowledge base is crucial for effectively communicating your needs to prospective vendors. Ensure these outcomes address the needs of all stakeholders, allowing you to assess how well the solution aligns with your requirements.

Your goals might include:

• Reduced call transfers
• Improved user experience
• Reduced efforts in searching for resources
• Higher first call resolution rate (FCR)
• Reduced onboarding time
• Consistent and quality tech support 
• Centralized hub of information 

Step 3: Questions to ask internal knowledge base software vendors.

When evaluating potential vendors for knowledge base software, it’s important to consider the logistics of implementing such a system. Here are some key questions you can consider asking:

• What is the typical timeline for implementing the knowledge base?
• What type of support do you offer during the implementation process?
• What ongoing support is available after implementation?
• How long does it take for all users to be fully active?
• Can you walk me through the standard implementation process?
• What does my IT team need to prepare for during implementation?
• Are user licenses role-based (e.g., different licenses for authors, admins, and regular users)?

Knowledge management is a crucial aspect of every business. By investing in a well-structured knowledge base, your organization can reduce costs and drastically improve workplace efficiency. 

Ready to build a knowledge base tailored to your needs? Get in touch with the experts at AllyMatter today and see the difference for yourself!